lupusintabula - Day Two |
| Link:36640 Sat Jan 23 00:16:47 2010 |
| Time:2006-07-06 22:24:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#586784 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:#3 #6 #11 |
#1 | |
| Ok, either the witch saved someone last night or the afflicted was found. I'll start, I was not attacked and saved last night. Anyone else? | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 22:27:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#587296 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:#4 #8 |
#2 | |
| I find it hard to believe the witch would save someone on day 1, when there is no intelligence to indicate the value of the victim. Which means I agree with I also hate to start the bandwagon so soon. Any other opinions? Oh, and I'm active now. F***ed by the time zone again. I'm going to set an alarm clock next time! | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 22:30:46 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#587808 | Parent:#1 Siblings:#6 #11 Children:(none) |
#3 | |
| Nor was I. Interesting. I guess all there is to say is it's good no one died, now time to kill someone. | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 22:31:41 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#588064 | Parent:#2 Siblings:#8 Children:(none) |
#4 | |
| Good to hear from you. Only one inactive left. | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 22:36:35 GMT Author: Subject:eh, I'll go with my gut. Link:36640#588320 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:(none) |
#5 | |
| VOTE I'll change my vote if they post. After work. | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 22:37:53 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#588576 | Parent:#1 Siblings:#3 #11 Children:#10 |
#6 | |
| This brings up a question. Is the mention of | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 22:38:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#588832 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:(none) |
#7 | |
| There's the possibility that the wolves picked the witch. Otherwise, yeah, it would seem they got the afflicted. | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 22:42:25 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#589088 | Parent:#2 Siblings:#4 Children:(none) |
#8 | |
| well if the witch had been targeted by the wolves, then they would obviously use the potion to save themselves . . . failing that, it is very hard to believe that the witch would save someone on night 1, although it did happen to me once when the wolves jumped me night one and the witch was new, so she saved me . . . and the mentioning of characters in the top is simply flavor text . . . it means nothing and is simply coincedence . . . there is no proof of daedalus's innocence or guilt up there :) | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 22:44:55 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#589344 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:(none) |
#9 | |
| vote | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 22:45:33 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#589600 | Parent:#6 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#10 | |
| He was a hat draw name. Plus, I think its funny and appropriate that the Sheepherd would be late to the meeting. | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 23:18:18 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#591136 | Parent:#1 Siblings:#3 #6 Children:#12 |
#11 | |
| Statements like this aren't much good. If the wolves found the afflicted, the afflicted would naturally lie and say he wasn't attacked. Would the witch know? If so I'd think they'd know who to poison tonight. Alternate theory: the WITCH was attacked, and used the healing potion to save herself. In which case the wolves know who the witch is, so she might as well come out to everybody. If some non-witch was attacked last night, they should come out and the witch should stay hidden. If more than one victim comes out, the witch will know who to poison tonight. That said, I'm not the witch, and I was not attacked last night. Also, I vote | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 23:23:57 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#591392 | Parent:#11 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#12 | |
| ok, the terminology isn't much different, but if it pleases you: I'm not the witch, and I was not attacked last night. "Sir, your broomstick took a bit of a beating last night . . . " Shutup | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 23:27:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#591648 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:#15 #26 |
#13 | |
| Why the hell am I stuck being the Sheepherd? *sigh* Anyway, I'm going to vote | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 23:31:23 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#592416 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:(none) |
#14 | |
Quack! | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 23:45:32 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#592928 | Parent:#13 Siblings:#26 Children:#18 |
#15 | |
| Oh- it's too late already. Muahahahaha | |||
| Time:2006-07-06 23:52:52 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#593440 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:#17 #19 #21 #24 #39 |
#16 | |
| Voting out Voting on old jokes/suspicions/grudges doesn't help either. So I'm going to vote | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 00:14:24 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#594208 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#19 #21 #24 #39 Children:(none) |
#17 | |
| Actually, there's less than a 50% chance this game of anyone being a normal villager. It's more likely that any particular individual is either a special or only *thinks* they're a villager. | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 00:14:57 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#594464 | Parent:#15 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#18 | |
| Eep! | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 00:19:39 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#594720 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#17 #21 #24 #39 Children:#20 |
#19 | |
| I believe if So I'm going to vote | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 01:50:25 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#594976 | Parent:#19 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#20 | |
| Ahem, vote | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 03:27:35 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#595232 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#17 #19 #24 #39 Children:(none) |
#21 | |
| Actually, historically, inactive players get killed off by the GM somtime mid-game. This is in addition to the daily lynch and nightly eat. If we assume you're correct about I'd rather not give these wolfy bastards the extra kill. | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 04:15:26 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#595488 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:#23 |
#22 | |
| someone tell me if this logic is right... we've got two independant seers. they spied on night zero and on night one. they didn't spy on themselves. no seer spied on anyone twice. they also didn't spy on there are 17568 ways this could happen. 233 (1%) of those ways involve them spying on the same two people. 5025 (28%) involve them spying on three unique people. The other 12310 (70%) involve them spying on four unique people. In other words, there's a 70% chance we've spied on four people already. 98% chance we've spied on three. That's not too shabby. Knowing for sure the state of four players on day 2 would be a big help. If both seers come out today, only one can get eaten tonight. If last night was an afflicted eat, we might even have a witch save left. even if we don't, we should have enough exposed to make it worthwhile for EVERYONE to come out. and push for a solution. or am I just crazy? | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 06:19:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#595744 | Parent:#22 Siblings:(none) Children:#33 |
#23 | |
| The afflicted and the ralph Secondly, having 2 seers means a wolf can masquerade as a seer more easily, at least for a night or two. Given 3 people claiming to be seers, how do you identify the one with a tail? Especially this early in the game. | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 06:20:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#596000 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#17 #19 #21 #39 Children:#25 |
#24 | |
| I vote But then, being paranoid is a normal reaction for a frightened newb villager. ;) | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 07:15:35 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#596512 | Parent:#24 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#25 | |
| I made a deal. unvote | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 07:26:34 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#597024 | Parent:#13 Siblings:#15 Children:#30 |
#26 | |
| I'll go with that logic. And she seems not to like me very much. :_( vote | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 14:07:19 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#597536 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:#28 #29 |
#27 | |
| unvote vote because Lest I get eaten tonight, here are my suspitions. As they're derived from some complex formulation that everyone seems to hate in addition to some assumptions I'm sure would be disputed, I'm not going to bother posting my logic. Please take them merely as my suspitions, not as some sort of gospel truth I'm trying to foist on you. Most wolflike at the top, last wolflike at the bottom: | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 14:09:02 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#597792 | Parent:#27 Siblings:#29 Children:(none) |
#28 | |
| Oh, and I'm busy from now until lunch, so I'm not likely to post again "today". | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 15:05:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#598048 | Parent:#27 Siblings:#28 Children:(none) |
#29 | |
| Well, jeeze. Am I in the lead for being lynched? I'll have to check that. Last I saw I had one vote. Seems suspicious for you to vote for me (19%) instead of | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 15:46:00 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#598560 | Parent:#26 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#30 | |
| I have my reasons for voting for you... I'll post them later before the lynching if it looks like I'm going. | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 15:46:46 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#598816 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #32 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:(none) |
#31 | |
| Though it's fairly useless for me to say it... I am not a wolf or a special, just a plain Jayne villager. Please don't vote for me! | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 15:56:52 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#599328 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #35 #37 #42 #44 Children:#34 |
#32 | |
| Eeep, sorry it took so long for me to get back to the village guys. I wanted to take some time to think, since the loss of While I appreciate his sacrifice, I still doubt its ability to help save us from the hairy scourge. Thanks for not deciding to kill me while I was gone. So it seems like I vote for | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 15:57:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#599584 | Parent:#23 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#33 | |
| also there's nothing to stop seers from spying on each other, so gorrillashaman's percents are slightly off (not by much probably) . . . if I understand correctly, independent seers means they don't even know about each other, so could both spy on each other . . . | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:04:18 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#600608 | Parent:#32 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#34 | |
| Quack Quack Quack!!! *The | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:13:40 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#601632 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #37 #42 #44 Children:#36 |
#35 | |
| I really think that I guess I should give my reasons for voting for | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:16:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#601888 | Parent:#35 Siblings:(none) Children:#38 |
#36 | |
| I guess that was a main comment. Duh. Anyway- evbilben always asserts that he's just a vanilla villager no specials or wolfiness- but he hasn't this time. Usually he starts with that as soon as he's voted for. So that's my reason for voting for him. Is it a fool-proof reason- no, of course not. But it is a reason, and not just a shot in the dark. If it looks like I'm getting lynched I'll change my vote to tie with | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:26:07 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#602144 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #42 #44 Children:(none) |
#37 | |
| unvote | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:32:05 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#602656 | Parent:#36 Siblings:(none) Children:#40 |
#38 | |
| switching your vote to | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:33:46 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#602912 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#17 #19 #21 #24 Children:(none) |
#39 | |
| I was joking about the grudge... :-) And I don't have the time to post a whole lot. And I'm not going to retaliate here by voting for you. I'm just going to repeat my vote from yesterday: vote | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:41:57 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#603680 | Parent:#38 Siblings:(none) Children:#41 |
#40 | |
| I guess I need to check And what about my kid, huh? I mean look at that face!!! :P | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:48:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#604192 | Parent:#40 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#41 | |
| *the ok, I agree, vote *the | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:49:11 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#604448 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #44 Children:#43 |
#42 | |
| I'm going to Vote | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 16:57:14 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:36640#604704 | Parent:#42 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#43 | |
| I agree she's usually much more vocal, but I'm trying to end our feud finally . . . The | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 17:51:24 GMT Author: Subject:Sunset Link:36640#604960 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #5 #7 #9 #13 #14 #16 #22 #27 #31 #32 #35 #37 #42 Children:#45 |
#44 | |
| Post closed. | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 18:02:43 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Sunset Link:36640#606240 | Parent:#44 Siblings:(none) Children:#46 |
#45 | |
| by the way, it looks like gorrillashaman's script isn't working completely correct . . . it's missing some of the posts . . . looks like five | |||
| Time:2006-07-07 18:10:04 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Sunset Link:36640#607520 | Parent:#45 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#46 | |
| Yeah, I noticed that. I'll bring it up on the Day 3 post. | |||
| vote | 2006-07-06 22:36:35 GMT | #5 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-06 22:44:55 GMT | #9 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-06 23:18:18 GMT | #11 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-06 23:27:47 GMT | #13 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-06 23:52:52 GMT | #16 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-07 01:50:25 GMT | #20 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-07 06:20:37 GMT | #24 | |||
| unvote | 2006-07-07 07:15:35 GMT | #25 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-07 07:26:34 GMT | #26 | |||
| unvote | 2006-07-07 14:07:19 GMT | #27 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-07 14:07:19 GMT | #27 | |||
| unvote | 2006-07-07 16:26:07 GMT | #37 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-07 16:26:07 GMT | #37 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-07 16:33:46 GMT | #39 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-07 16:48:31 GMT | #41 | |||
| vote | 2006-07-07 16:49:11 GMT | #42 |
| 3 against | : | ||
| 2 against | : | ||
| 1 against | : | ||
| 1 against | : | ||
| 1 against | : | ||
| 1 against | : | ||
| 1 against | : | ||
| Posted but no vote | : | ||
| posts by | : | (9) | #7 #9 #15 #29 #30 #31 #35 #36 #40 | |
| posts by | : | (8) | #1 #8 #12 #33 #38 #41 #43 #45 | |
| posts by | : | (5) | #3 #4 #5 #25 #26 | |
| posts by | : | (5) | #11 #21 #22 #27 #28 | |
| posts by | : | (4) | #2 #6 #16 #23 | |
| posts by | : | (3) | #10 #44 #46 | |
| posts by | : | (3) | #13 #17 #18 | |
| posts by | : | (3) | #19 #20 #37 | |
| posts by | : | (2) | #14 #34 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #24 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #42 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #32 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #39 |