lupusintabula - Day 4

Link:14007 Sat Jan 23 00:21:56 2010

The jarring Wolf howls of last night were comingled with crashes of lightning. The sun dawns as the weather breaks on the drenched hamlet. Slowly the Village comes together in the Town Square, slogging their way through muddy streets. When you realize the Smith and the Midwife are both missing, the tired mob makes their way to the smithy to search for [info]amphitrite27's corpse. Surprisingly searching through her house and workshop turns up nothing. Her door is unbarred, but in good order.

The group makes their way onward through the sodden streets to the cottage of the Midwife [info]pergatorigirl to find the door pulled off and thrown into the street. Inside is a grizzly scene! A large, curly haired hamster-like creature lies sprawled across a table, its head exploded. On the ground near the table, thrown carelessly and covered in blood, is a deck of Tarot cards. On the far wall is the ashen remains of the Midwife [info]pergatorigirl, destroyed by the gaze of the Werehamster!

Summary: [info]amphitrite27 the WEREHAMSTER is DEAD. [info]pergatorigirl the SEER is DEAD.
Time:2005-09-09 19:20:01 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#240567

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:(none)
 #1
Wow, that was unexpected... I suspected [info]pergatorigirl of being the hamster. It's unfortunate that she's gone, but at least she took the hamster down first! One curious thing, though... If the seer killed the hamster, and the hamster killed the seer, who did the wolf/wolves go after? Was someone saved last night?


Time:2005-09-09 19:21:13 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#240823

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:(none)
 #2
Also, isn't this day 4 now? Or is it Groundhog Day? :)


Time:2005-09-09 19:22:55 GMT
Author:[info]girlpurple
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#241079

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#26
#3
Right then... just to reveal how ignorant I am of all the game play...

So, Seer was killed by Werehamster
and since the Werehamster can't be killed except by lynching or being seen by the Seer, it was a mutual "attack"?

And the wolves fail again???


Time:2005-09-09 19:23:25 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#241335

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#6 #21
#4
Okay - we've killed:
[info]amphitrite27, the WEREHAMSTER
[info]stride and [info]gnatdbug, WEREWOLVES.

We have one original WEREWOLF left. We have the possibility of the AFFLICTED (being) turned into a WEREWOLF.

That's it folks. That's all we've got to beat.

[GM: Please confirm how the AFFLICTED character, if turned, interacts (if at all) with the original WEREWOLVES. And assuming they don't get to, after the original WEREWOLVES are killed, we still have to kill the AFFLICTED, right? And do they get to continue killing each night if they're the only remaining WEREWOLF?]

I propose that the MASONS out themselves. They are two VILLAGERS that know one another's identity. If the remaining WEREWOLF and the AFFLICTED are in communication, they (working together) are the only remaining way to LIE and dispute that claim.


Time:2005-09-09 19:35:58 GMT
Author:[info]flipperchaz
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#241847

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#9 #10 #11
#5
Well here's what we got from the claim game:

Day1:
1. [info]girlpurple is a wolf
2. [info]herufeanor is a hampster
3. [info]flipperchaz is a villager

Day2:
no claims

Day3:
1. amphitrie27 is a wolf
2. [info]parzanese is a villager
3. [info]girlpurple is a villager

We know 2 is out, since [info]herufeanor was not the hamster. Could be 1 or 3. Interesting that on day 3 [info]pergatorigirl voted for amphitrie27 right at the beginning of the day and never changed her vote, despite everything going on.


Time:2005-09-09 19:36:49 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#242103

Parent:#4
Siblings:#21
Children:#8 #12 #14
#6
(Additional logic behind my suggestion - the only special ability of the MASONS is to corroborate each other's claim. They're no more a target of the wolves than anyone else once outed. In fact, they're safer, since there's no special ability to try and remove from play. It's the same logic, btw, as outing myself as the CUPID, which I am. I can out either or both lovers. My truthful claim can only be disputed by disruptive wolves, and there aren't enough remaining to outweigh the defense of two real lovers. We've got three special character (but essentially plain) villagers here that can be identified, and are low risk targets.

That also sorta identifies the Hunter and Bodyguard (who have both already come out without dispute anyway though.)

My vote might be swayed by a convincing argument that we've misidentified the HUNTER or BODYGUARD before, or if the MASONS (who I'm sure I've identified since loosing the SEER) convince me that I'm guessing wrong here, but I think the only remaining characters that can be the AFFLICTED([info]daedalus4096) and the remaining WEREWOLF (VOTE [info]gpeefalt).


Time:2005-09-09 19:37:55 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#242359

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#18
#7
If the masons out themselves, then we have:

1) the werewolves claim to be masons also, and we have 4 potential werewolves - which we can easily kill in 3 lynchings total.
2) the werewolves do not claim to be masons, so we have 2 less suspects.

Also, am I correct in assuming the werewolves did not kill anyone last night?


Time:2005-09-09 19:39:33 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#242615

Parent:#6
Siblings:#12 #14
Children:#29
#8
do NOT out the lovers. speaking from previous experience, they are an instant target, due to the 2-for-1 nature of such a kill. Also, outing them as lovers doesn't validate them as villagers. We'll assume that you're Cupid unless someone else steps forward.


Time:2005-09-09 19:39:48 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#242871

Parent:#5
Siblings:#10 #11
Children:#15
#9
Okay, so assuming that she intended to exonerate [info]Flipperchaz and [info]Girlpurple, and comparing notes with the list of suspects that [info]Parzanese has already shared, it seems to me that our three most likely suspects are [info]Gpeefalt, [info]Perkyevil, and [info]Princeofwands. So, I'm going to go out on a limb here and pick one to start with...

Vote [info]Perkyevil.

Discuss.


Time:2005-09-09 19:40:21 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#243127

Parent:#5
Siblings:#9 #11
Children:#28
#10
We've identified amphrite27 as the WEREHAMSTER - therefore wasn't a wolf. The Day3 blame game identifies rule 3 as the true rule.

[info]girlpurple is a villager.
[info]flipperchaz is a villager.

No good reason to disbelieve either claim therefore that she's a plain villager and that you're the hunter.


Time:2005-09-09 19:41:21 GMT
Author:[info]flipperchaz
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#243383

Parent:#5
Siblings:#9 #10
Children:(none)
 #11
Scratch that. Duh.


Time:2005-09-09 19:41:30 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#243639

Parent:#6
Siblings:#8 #14
Children:#13
#12
one more thing - are you saying that daedalus is the afflicted and [info]gpeefalt is the werewolf? Because the seer's claim game seems to point to [info]girlpurple or amphitrie27.


Time:2005-09-09 19:42:05 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#243895

Parent:#12
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #13
nevermind, ignore this. misread the claims.


Time:2005-09-09 19:43:51 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#244407

Parent:#6
Siblings:#8 #12
Children:#17
#14
Excuse me, but I'm just a villager here. If I do have the misfortune of being so tainted, it hasn't been triggered.


Time:2005-09-09 19:45:11 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#244663

Parent:#9
Siblings:(none)
Children:#16 #22
#15
Unless we are to take [info]parzanese as a lying WEREWOLF, we have to assume that in faking being the SEER, he had some compelling reason to defend the identity of [info]perkyevil. There's an obvious-to-me arguement there. I know I'm not a wolf. I can proove I'm not a wolf by identifying either or both lovers (but agree that it's too costly to do unless we need to). I believe that Joe isn't a wolf, had a reason to believe that [info]perkyevil also wasn't a wolf, and while defending her last night identified [info]gpeefalt as a likely wolf. That's the obvious conclusion for me too - as I've already voted above.


Time:2005-09-09 19:48:41 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#245175

Parent:#15
Siblings:#22
Children:#23
#16
Did I miss something? I thought he put [info]Perkyevil on his short list of suspects.


Time:2005-09-09 19:50:36 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#245431

Parent:#14
Siblings:(none)
Children:#20
#17
So, we kill [info]gpeefalt. If he wasn't a WEREWOLF, we've got another problem. If he IS a WEREWOLF, then either the game is over and we (the villagers) win, OR the game is still running, and the AFFLICTED was turned and needs killed.

Sorry, but for the time being, you're top of my list. But you don't have to worry about me turning toward discussing lynching you until after all that resolves itself.


Time:2005-09-09 19:50:44 GMT
Author:[info]lupusintabula
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#245687

Parent:#7
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #18
No Werewolf kills last night.


Time:2005-09-09 19:50:45 GMT
Author:[info]flipperchaz
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#245943

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#24 #27 #52
#19
And since [info]stride is no longer around:

[info]daedalus4096
[info]flipperchaz: HUNTER (cleared by the SEER)
[info]girlpurple: (cleared by the SEER)
[info]gpeefalt
[info]hungryandhollow
[info]kraydon: WITCH*
[info]parzanese
[info]perkyevil
[info]princeofwands: CUPID*

[info]pergatorigirl: DEAD SEER
[info]amphitrite27: DEAD HAMSTER
[info]stride: DEAD WOLF
[info]evilben: DEAD VILLAGER
[info]gnatdbug: DEAD WOLF
[info]herufeanor: DEAD VILLAGER
[info]pianorain: DEAD [info]NADER
[info]the1mouse: DEAD MARTYR

*Not proven until death. Yadda yadda yadda...


Time:2005-09-09 19:52:19 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#246199

Parent:#17
Siblings:(none)
Children:#30
#20
Uh... Thanks? I think?


Time:2005-09-09 19:52:47 GMT
Author:[info]lupusintabula
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#246711

Parent:#4
Siblings:#6
Children:(none)
 #21
If the Afflicted is activated, he becomes part of the Werewolf community. He gets to know who all the other Werewolves are and gets to vote in who to eat at the nightly Werewolf meetings.


Time:2005-09-09 19:54:11 GMT
Author:[info]gpeefalt
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#246967

Parent:#15
Siblings:#16
Children:(none)
 #22
I have no idea how all of a sudden I enter into your logic. I may be fairly silent, but that is just because I am new to the game. I'm happy the GM made me a plain villager so I don't have the fear of doing anything stupid. I'm just following the posts and voting with my gut.

vote [info]princeofwands


Time:2005-09-09 19:54:38 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#247223

Parent:#16
Siblings:(none)
Children:#25
#23
Yeah, he did, but then he took it back ("I have much better suspects").

And look at the particular couched phrasing he used in the initial suspicion.


Time:2005-09-09 19:56:54 GMT
Author:[info]flipperchaz
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#247479

Parent:#19
Siblings:#27 #52
Children:#32
#24
Whoops, missed one...

[info]daedalus4096
[info]flipperchaz: HUNTER (cleared by the SEER)
[info]girlpurple: (cleared by the SEER)
[info]gpeefalt
[info]hungryandhollow: BODYGUARD*
[info]kraydon: WITCH*
[info]parzanese
[info]perkyevil
[info]princeofwands: CUPID*

[info]pergatorigirl: DEAD SEER
[info]amphitrite27: DEAD HAMSTER
[info]stride: DEAD WOLF
[info]evilben: DEAD VILLAGER
[info]gnatdbug: DEAD WOLF
[info]herufeanor: DEAD VILLAGER
[info]pianorain: DEAD [info]NADER
[info]the1mouse: DEAD MARTYR


Time:2005-09-09 19:58:00 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#247735

Parent:#23
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #25
Hmm... Good point...


Time:2005-09-09 20:01:27 GMT
Author:[info]lupusintabula
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#248247

Parent:#3
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #26
They killed eachother. No Werewolf kill.


Time:2005-09-09 20:04:39 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#248503

Parent:#19
Siblings:#24 #52
Children:(none)
 #27
5 suspects. One WEREWOLF. One AFFLICTED(state unknown). Two MASONS. One Bodyguard.

When the MASONS out and verify each other, it removes them from the list of suspects.

[info]hungryandhollow has made an uncontested claim to be the BODYGUARD. If that's correct (and I don't have any reason to not believe it so far), we'll be left with two suspects and that one wolf and one afflicted problem again.


Time:2005-09-09 20:06:25 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#249015

Parent:#10
Siblings:(none)
Children:#33 #59
#28
Actually, I just realized something... Assuming that [info]Kraydon isn't lying about being the witch and saving herself on night 1, the first possible time for the afflicted to turn, if he/she has, would be night two. If the afflicted has turned, then that would mean that [info]Flipperchaz could still be the afflicted even though he was previously cleared. Also, [info]Girlpurple would have been scried on the same night. I don't know if the seer would have picked up villager or wolf in that case, though. Granted, I don't currently have sufficient reason to accuse either of them, but their innocence isn't something we can take for granted just yet.


Time:2005-09-09 20:09:29 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#250039

Parent:#8
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #29
Nope. No need to out them. Their status really doesn't get us anything this late into this particular game, other than validating my uncontested claim as Cupid.


Time:2005-09-09 20:10:48 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#250295

Parent:#20
Siblings:(none)
Children:#31
#30
Yeah. You get the benefit of the doubt until there's a new problem demanding we defeat one more wolf. I'm on your side... at least until tomorrow.


Time:2005-09-09 20:11:33 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#250551

Parent:#30
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #31
I'll take what I can get, thanks. :)


Time:2005-09-09 20:15:59 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#250807

Parent:#24
Siblings:(none)
Children:#34
#32
4 suspects. 2 masons, 1 wolf, 1 afflcited.

(All of this assuming the Bodyguard claim is truthful; and that I am in fact the Cupid)

We identify the masons and are left with a wolf and an afflcited.
(Or we get all four in contention - claiming as pairs, but only if the afflcited is already a wolf!)


If the masons go into contention then we know the afflicted has changed. If they don't we don't know either way, but we do know who the MASONS are - that gives us two people to deal with.

A wolf and a potential wolf. We kill one tonight. If we're right then either we've won, or we've got one left (the turned afflicted) to get. If we kill the wrong person (that same unchanged afflcited), then ew've only got one suspect left, and it's that damned remaining wolf. The only lucky break we face in hastilly killing the unturned afflicted is that the wolf can't target that person tonight and turn them into a new helper wolf.


Time:2005-09-09 20:22:03 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#251063

Parent:#28
Siblings:#59
Children:#36
#33
A valid point. But we don't have any reason to disbelieve [info]flipperchaz's claim to be the HUNTER. He can't be both the HUNTER and the AFFLCITED. Why would he lie about being the HUNTER if he thought he was a plain villager - unless he is a turned AFFLICTED being the wolf.

Anyone else wanna step up and claim to the the HUNTER?
Or the WITCH or CUPID for that matter?
The timing for a cleared [info]flipperchaz to really now be a turned wolf claiming to be the HUNTER is really tricksy though, no?


Time:2005-09-09 20:26:12 GMT
Author:[info]flipperchaz
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#251831

Parent:#32
Siblings:(none)
Children:#38
#34
Damn, that spelling corrector really likes to cause votes for the [info]duck. :-)

Unvote [info]duck

I agree that the MASONS should come out. In the meantime, I'll follow your lead and vote [info]gpeefalt. Why would he vote for the undisputed CUPID if he were a villager?


Time:2005-09-09 20:27:12 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#252087

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#37
#35
yea, i don't think we can do much until the masons out themselves. from there we can decide which of the 2 remaining peoples to lynch.

I'm also interested in why the werewolves didn't get a kill last night. Anyone want to shed some light on the subject?


Time:2005-09-09 20:28:03 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#252343

Parent:#33
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #36
Like I said, I don't actually suspect them enough to call them out on it. I simply think it would be dangerous to clear them completely based on what could be faulty information.


Time:2005-09-09 20:30:21 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#252599

Parent:#35
Siblings:(none)
Children:#40
#37
Well, being the Bodyguard, you're the only one left who could save someone. So if you're not claiming to have saved anyone, that means they probably either attacked the hamster or triggered the afflicted.


Time:2005-09-09 20:34:39 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#253111

Parent:#34
Siblings:(none)
Children:#39
#38
The most obvious answer, other than him being a wolf of course, is that he's the real Cupid and would prefer to resolve the situation without outing himself. Whether this is actually the case or not is, obviously, beyond my ken.


Time:2005-09-09 20:48:46 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#254647

Parent:#38
Siblings:(none)
Children:#51
#39
The only good reason I came up with to not explicitly out oneself as cupid is that it removes the list of specials that other not-yet-identified-villagers (like the SEER or the WITCH) might be. No point in still clinging to that now that both of them have been outed.


Time:2005-09-09 20:56:21 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#254903

Parent:#37
Siblings:(none)
Children:#41
#40
It'd seem smart at this point for anyone to give up any information they've got on BODYGUARD saves. (Well, has any villager been notified that they were attacked but saved by the BODYGUARD?) (Is that a correct reading of the chart for how that notifcation system works?)


Time:2005-09-09 20:59:35 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#255159

Parent:#40
Siblings:(none)
Children:#42 #57
#41
no one has been saved by me. This means that, since the werewolves would not attack the hampster two nights in a row, the afflicted has been turned. we have 2 werewolves among us still.


Time:2005-09-09 21:03:20 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#255415

Parent:#41
Siblings:#57
Children:#43
#42
Could it also mean that the wolves attacked either the seer or hamster but were lower in the order of operations? (Still learning the rules)


Time:2005-09-09 21:06:50 GMT
Author:[info]lupusintabula
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#255671

Parent:#42
Siblings:(none)
Children:#45 #47
#43
All attacks are done simulaneously and blindly. If the Hamster targets the final Wolf, and that Wolf targets the Seer, then all 3 die.


Time:2005-09-09 21:07:29 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#255927

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#61
#44
Of the 4 left, 2 are masons and 2 are werewolves. So, own up, people.

[info]daedalus4096
[info]gpeefalt
[info]parzanese
[info]perkyevil

Even if it takes us 3 lynchings to figure it out, we can't lose (presuming that the wolves are, of course, among those two).


Time:2005-09-09 21:08:09 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#256439

Parent:#43
Siblings:#47
Children:#46 #48
#45
but if the hampster and the wolf targeted the seer, and the seer targeted the hampster, then we'd only have 2 deaths.


Time:2005-09-09 21:12:40 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#256951

Parent:#45
Siblings:#48
Children:(none)
 #46
Exactly the case I was envisioning.


Time:2005-09-09 21:43:36 GMT
Author:[info]joelzero
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#258231

Parent:#43
Siblings:#45
Children:(none)
 #47
Umm...I mean't both die. If the Seer views the Hamster, and the Hamster attacks a Wolf, and that Wolf attacks the Seer, then all 3 die.


Time:2005-09-09 22:13:31 GMT
Author:[info]girlpurple
Subject:So many questions...
Link:14007#260535

Parent:#45
Siblings:#46
Children:#50
#48
If the hamster and the wolves targeted the same vicitm, does the kill look like a hamster kill or a wolf kill? Or does the GM choose randomly somehow?


Time:2005-09-09 22:14:49 GMT
Author:[info]girlpurple
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#260791

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#53
#49
vote [info]gpeefalt

Sorry dude... your immediate targeting of [info]princeofwands looks WAY suspicious


Time:2005-09-09 22:17:55 GMT
Author:[info]lupusintabula
Subject:Re: So many questions...
Link:14007#261047

Parent:#48
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #50
I'd prolly go with a combo kill, such as a green, bloated, clawed corpse, (poison breath and wolf claws) just for novelty's sake


Time:2005-09-09 22:27:12 GMT
Author:[info]gpeefalt
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#261559

Parent:#39
Siblings:(none)
Children:#56
#51
You do realize, that if the afflicted has been turned, that those cleared by the seer are no longer cleared.


Time:2005-09-09 22:28:36 GMT
Author:[info]gpeefalt
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#262071

Parent:#19
Siblings:#24 #27
Children:(none)
 #52
Can we claim [info]girlpurple is cleared if the afflicted has been turned?


Time:2005-09-09 22:30:10 GMT
Author:[info]gpeefalt
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#262583

Parent:#49
Siblings:(none)
Children:#55 #102
#53
Perhaps I was being rash with my vote. Inexperience perhaps.

I will
unvote [info]princeofwands
and reserve my vote until later.


Time:2005-09-09 22:44:56 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#263351

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:(none)
 #54
After reviewing the evidence further, I have to agree that there isn't as much evidence against [info]Perkyevil as I initially thought. With that being the case, I'm changing my vote to the next suspect on my list.

Unvote [info]Perkyevil. Vote [info]Gpeefalt.


Time:2005-09-09 22:45:38 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#263607

Parent:#53
Siblings:#102
Children:#95
#55
The script won't pick up your retraction unless you either vote for someone else or [info]abstain.


Time:2005-09-09 22:55:25 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#264119

Parent:#51
Siblings:(none)
Children:#60
#56
Yeah, but no player can be both the Hunter and Afflicted - so assuming we trust [info]flipperchaz to be the Hunter, then his being cleared by the Seer isn't reversible.

[info]girlpurple to be suspect would have to be 1- the afflicted (is possible) 2- attacked last night (also possible). However, that wouldn't change who we suspect this round as being a wolf.

After we kill you, we'll reassess our situation wrt wolves and go from there. I still think this all looks a lot clearer once we've spoken to the Masons.


Time:2005-09-09 22:58:41 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#264375

Parent:#41
Siblings:#42
Children:#66
#57
Ok. So my other question here- who have you protected each round? Then we know who the wolves haven't been attacking.


Time:2005-09-09 23:16:30 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#265655

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#67 #68 #72
#58
I don't have much time, but I got the impression from [info]stride that the wolves attacked the werehamster on night 2. Which means two wolves and three suspects:

[info]daedalus4096
[info]girlpurple
[info]gpeefalt

one was the original wolf, one is the new wolf (and both don't know who they are yet), and one is a poor villager . . . oh and one is a lover of those not listed there (so one wolf might get screwed by the other wolf)

those are my only three suspects left . . . and I'll have to review my notes to make a best guess from the three of them . . .


Time:2005-09-09 23:21:43 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#266167

Parent:#28
Siblings:#33
Children:#62
#59
[info]girlpurple could have been turned last night, in which case at the time the seer's claim would have been true


Time:2005-09-09 23:23:37 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#266679

Parent:#56
Siblings:(none)
Children:#63
#60
see my reasoning for lynching [info]girlpurple yesterday before we found a better target was valid :)


Time:2005-09-09 23:25:22 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#266935

Parent:#44
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #61
you are forgetting [info]girlpurple who could be the afflicted and was turned last night . . . [info]stride implied right before she died that I was wrong and she knew who the werehamster was . . . the only way she would know if if they attacked her on the second night . . . so assume the afflicted was turned last night in which case all seer data on normal villagers is already invalid . . .


Time:2005-09-09 23:28:50 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#267191

Parent:#59
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #62
Also true. I was simply attemping to describe the most restrictive case.


Time:2005-09-09 23:30:44 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#267447

Parent:#60
Siblings:(none)
Children:#64
#63
Yesterday she was still just a plain jane villager though. Today she may be a turned afflicted and need killin'. But killing her yesterday would have just preserved our perfect lynch record.


Time:2005-09-10 00:26:22 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#268215

Parent:#63
Siblings:(none)
Children:#65
#64
ahh but if we had no one better (which we thankfully did), it would have been a good preventative measure :)


Time:2005-09-10 00:31:48 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#268471

Parent:#64
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #65
Right up to the point where we'd killed an innocent villager and left the wolves to kill someone else in the night. We'd have seen two villager deaths and not have killed a wolf, and still had to worry about if there was the Afflicted character still wandering around.


Time:2005-09-10 00:52:58 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#268727

Parent:#57
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #66
Night 1 - [info]Pianorain
Night 2 - [info]Kraydon
Night 3 - [info]Parzanese


Time:2005-09-10 00:55:20 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#268983

Parent:#58
Siblings:#68 #72
Children:#73
#67
Two wolves. Three suspects.

And one of them is the afflicted who was turned last night, so old evidence doesn't help with that one.

Tough lot.

Interesting gamble claiming that only one of the three suspects is one of the lovers. Running out the permutations tree, I'm not sure what you think we got for that.


Time:2005-09-10 01:04:07 GMT
Author:[info]girlpurple
Subject:Just a sweet, innocent, unloved village girl...
Link:14007#269239

Parent:#58
Siblings:#67 #72
Children:#69
#68
If I'm the new wolf, I haven't been told yet.

And [info]princeofwands should be able to give us at least a little somethin' somethin' WRT the lovers, right?

GP
(not blonde, but planning to have purple streaks again after next Tuesday!)


Time:2005-09-10 03:04:22 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:Re: Just a sweet, innocent, unloved village girl...
Link:14007#269751

Parent:#68
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #69
the lovers are irrelevant, as they can be villagers or wolves. not even Cupid knows.


Time:2005-09-10 05:52:51 GMT
Author:[info]perkyevil
Subject:And today ends????
Link:14007#270263

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#71
#70
Just to confirm - the end of this 'day' is going to be Mon at 11am, right?


Time:2005-09-10 06:52:41 GMT
Author:[info]lupusintabula
Subject:Re: And today ends????
Link:14007#270519

Parent:#70
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #71
You got it.


Time:2005-09-10 09:03:43 GMT
Author:[info]flipperchaz
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#271287

Parent:#58
Siblings:#67 #68
Children:(none)
 #72
I apologize, mabey I missed something in prior posts, but...

1) Why is [info]perkyevil not in your list of suspects?

2) oh and one is a lover of those not listed there
Where does this come from?


Time:2005-09-10 09:12:02 GMT
Author:[info]flipperchaz
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#271543

Parent:#67
Siblings:(none)
Children:#74
#73
Are you agreeing with him that there are only three suspects, and that one of those he mentioned must be the turned afflicted?

Not even getting into the lover thing now. No idea where he gets that, but I don't think it matters much at this point who they are.

Unrelated question: Why have the MASONS not yet come out? Is it not clear that doing so does not put them at any risk?


Time:2005-09-10 14:39:09 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#272311

Parent:#73
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #74
Yes, I'm agreeing that there are three suspects for the remaining two wolves (one of whom is the afflicted and was turned last night).

The lovers claim is an interesting one, but I'm hanging back on commenting on it until I better understand the implications of confirming or denying it.

I imagine that the masons have kept quiet while they each make a similar deliberation about what information they reveal.


Time:2005-09-10 17:48:07 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#272567

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#78 #79
#75
ok I was hoping to have the protection of the bodyguard tonight, but apparently since he protected me last night (thanks for that even though it screws with me today) I might as well tell you everything I suspect . . .

1) the afflicted was turned last night
2) the only "known" villager yesterday was [info]girlpurple
3) the wolf targeted [info]girlpurple hoping she was the afflicted and got lucky
4) [info]girlpurple is the afflicted and is now a wolf
5) the wolves didn't attack the bodyguard last night, which would have been a prime target to attack
6) they also didn't attack any of the known villagers that we all mostly trust
7) instead they attacked someone who we still somewhat suspected: [info]girlpurple
8) why would they do that when wolves would greedily eat the bodyguard as soon as they found him
9) the lone wolf remaining has been devious. He voted for [info]gnatdbug who was really never in any real danger as so many of us townsfolk were voting for [info]evilben
10) the lone remaining wolf voted for [info]stride at the end when it was obvious that she was going to get lynched
11) the lone remaining wolf has a lover that he has been protecting
12) the lone remaining wolf has the majority of his seer claims as true and has been encouraging people on to produce claims so that he could try and identify the seer (with many of his claims as true I thought he might even be the seer)
13) the reason the bodyguard didn't die last night, the reason the wolf took a chance on a poor villager in an attempt to find the afflicted, was that the wolf couldn't attack the bodyguard since the bodyguard is his lover
14) the wolf is [info]daedalus4096
15) the afflicted and now new werewolf is [info]girlpurple
16) [info]gpeefalt is probably just a poor villager, please unvote her

Vote [info]Daedalus4096


Time:2005-09-10 17:50:25 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#272823

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:(none)
 #76
oh and I know the wolves lover will say, but he never told me this or he never hinted that he was a wolf and that I should be killing everyone off . . . my answer to that is that he didn't need to . . . and he wouldn't risk it . . . for even without him telling you that he was a wolf, you would happily go on lynching everyone but him, which is exactly his goal . . . and to the wolf's lover . . . I really am sorry that you picked poorly in your love . . . and I am sorry that you will die when we lynch his furry ass . . . but thanks for protecting me the other night :)


Time:2005-09-10 17:52:03 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#273079

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#94
#77
oh and if you really hadn't figured it out yet . . . as a powerful, rich, vampiric mayor of a prosperous city called Millers Hollow, of course I'm part of a secret organization of powerful rich evil doers . . . and yes [info]perkyevil is part of it too . . . look at her name for christ sake . . . it has evil written all over it . . . and of course our organization always gets a bad wrap . . .


Time:2005-09-10 18:51:51 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#273335

Parent:#75
Siblings:#79
Children:#80
#78
Nicely done, Sir!

I'd missed the mechanics of the Bodyguard connection while trying to not expose the Lovers, but you're quite right - scrambling for the afflicted before taking out the confessed bodyguard exposes that pair.

(Another point to confirm - of the 153 possible lover combinations, most of them have been eliminated as possible through voting or deaths. If you remove [info]parzanese and I from consideration, and verify that the three remaining suspects have all voted for one another at one time or another -- well, how many options have you got left?)

The only remaining reason you have to doubt either of us is if we've been collaborating as wolves - unlikely since 1) one of us would have to have been turned last night and 2) as Cupid, I can confirm the identities of the Lovers as [info]daedalus4096 and [info]hungryandhollow.

And to [info]flipperchaz's question about the Masons - there are only nine of us left in the game right now, with Cupid, Hunter, Bodyguard, and a Witch identified, we're left with two Masons and three suspects. I don't think it can actually be spelled out any more clearly than that without spelling it out...


UNVOTE [info]gpeefalt
VOTE [info]daedalus4096

I agree with the suspicion that [info]girlpurple is the likely afflicted, but it'd based on speculation, and we haven't proof that it isn't [info]gpeefalt. One problem at a time though.


Time:2005-09-10 19:51:05 GMT
Author:[info]perkyevil
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#273847

Parent:#75
Siblings:#78
Children:(none)
 #79
Vote [info]Daedalus4096


Time:2005-09-10 20:50:44 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#274103

Parent:#78
Siblings:(none)
Children:#82
#80
oh I'm down to 8 possible combinations for lovers . . . however there's only one possible combination left with [info]hungryandhollow (as a result of so many people voting for him yesterday) . . .

and you sorta gave away daedalus the other day when you said you had proof and then said to him "you'd back me up, no?"

and correct we don't know for sure it isn't [info]gpeefalt or [info]girlpurple . . . course if either of them is a wolf, it's in their best interest to vote daedalus anyway as let's face it the lovers would turn on them in an instant . . .

at this point daedalus can only have h&h or [info]kraydon as a lover . . . h&h can only have daedalus . . . [info]kraydon can have 4 potential ones as can [info]girlpurple . . .


Time:2005-09-10 22:15:16 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#274359

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#84 #85
#81
Ok, let's say you're right and daedelus is a wolf. If so, why don't you vote [info]girlpurple tonight, so someone can have the protection of the bodyguard for one more night? I'm still operating as a villager, so I'll be protecting someone tonight. This just plain makes more sense.

1) [info]Parzanese has not been proven to be a villager.
2) It makes no sense to kill the bodyguard when a wolf will still live.
3) [info]Parzanese's suggestion means that you'll kill Daedelus - maybe a wolf, maybe not - and therefore kill me also, losing the last possible person that could save anyone.

For these reasons, you should vote [info]girlpurple. For all we know, the afflicted could be [info]Parzanese. Maybe I've missed something, but he hasn't been verified as far as I recall.


Time:2005-09-10 23:27:14 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#274615

Parent:#80
Siblings:(none)
Children:#83
#82
It's rapidly not going to matter anymore, but my bookkeeping looks different than yours on that I believe that [info]girlpurple has remaining three possible pairings. ([info]flipperchaz, [info]kraydon, and [info]perkyevil)


Time:2005-09-10 23:40:05 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#274871

Parent:#82
Siblings:(none)
Children:#86
#83
yep you're right . . . I haven't updated my spreadsheet with today's votes yet so [info]gpeefalt was still on her list as remaining pairings . . . my master doc is at work . . . what i have here with me is an online version that I've been too lazy to put on my home computer and update and save :) . . . so it ends up in an updated but unsaved mode . . . regardless I'm down to less than 8 pairings (6 or 8 I think) . . . sadly due to this, next game, the lovers will be more careful about who the vote for and how often they change their votes . . .


Time:2005-09-10 23:46:55 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#275127

Parent:#81
Siblings:#85
Children:#92
#84
you're grasping at straws now . . .

1) fine I'm a mason . . . duh . . . [info]perkyevil will confirm . . .
2) sure it does, when because of your sexual relations with a wolf, you're bad too (so we have three bad people to deal with) . . . we get two for the price of one now (which means less confusion tomorrow when we only have one to get rid of) . . .
3) even in the remote possibility that we're wrong, there will only be two suspects and two wolves left . . . but it's a remote possibility . . .

and [info]girlpurple will be nice to me and not kill me tonight . . . right [info]girlpurple :)

if it makes you feel better we could all switch our votes to you instead of daedalus? it achieves the same result in the end . . . and [info]girlpurple, despite probably being the afflicted, will probably go along with us too on that one . . .

also odds of you and daedalus picking the same person tonight is pretty slim, and well unlikely considering that you're lovers and all . . . and lets face it, [info]herufeanor didn't leave you, you left him :)


Time:2005-09-11 00:02:34 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#275383

Parent:#81
Siblings:#84
Children:(none)
 #85
There's no conclusive proof that [info]parzanese is a villager, but if he is a lying wolf, then we're due a pair of masons standing up and disputing his claim above that he and [info]perkyevil are the Masons.

And well, all of the people left to make that claim have already tried to pass themselves off as "plain villagers". We've got a plain villager, an original wolf, and a turned afflicted to convincingly tell us that two of them have been masons all along.

No dice.

Now - the way I see it, our options are to lynch [info]daedalus4096 today (sadly, resulting in your immediate death as well, but if he's to go eventually, so are you). Go tonight with no bodyguard and lose someone to the wolves. Tomorrow lynch [info]girlpurple. If we've somehow been wrong, one more villager goes to wolf meat and then we get [info]gpeefalt. We lynch 2 wolves (an innocent villager, sorry Ames), and lose two villagers to wolves and one to a suicide pact. 4 villager deaths. Ick. If we're right tomorrow though, then we skip the mistaken lynching and extra wolf raid, it's only 2 villager deaths.

If however, we lynch [info]girlpurple tonight and are wrong, there's a wolf attack (that is maybe defeneded by you), another lynching tomorrow (do we again spare you until the last?), wolf attack, and final lynching and suicide pact death. Same 4 villagers, but only 2 if we don't mistakinly lynch the wrong person. With some disappearing chance that you'll happen to defend the best candidate. As the wolves have observed - you can't defend [info]parzanese tonight.

There is some mercy in letting you live the extra day. But there isn't much strategic value to doing so. It's nearly a coin toss for condemning you today or tomorrow. And sadly, as long as [info]daedalus4096 is around, you two represent a 3rd threat that the wolves and villagers alike must deal with.


Time:2005-09-11 00:12:21 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#275639

Parent:#83
Siblings:(none)
Children:#87 #88
#86
I only fell to 8 pairing in the process of both ruling you out and counting today's votes. Hrmn. Weird. Anyway - like I said - they're out, it's done. But I'm curious if my tracking got broken somewhere along the way.


Time:2005-09-11 00:23:12 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#275895

Parent:#86
Siblings:#88
Children:(none)
 #87
nope, I just updated my spreadsheet . . . and i have 8 pairings too . . . I think I counted [info]perkyevil as having voted for [info]gpeefalt since almost everyone else did at the beginning of this day . . . 2 for daedalus, 1 for [info]flipperchaz, 3 for [info]girlpurple, 2 for [info]gpeefalt, 1 for h&h, 4 for [info]kraydon, 3 for [info]perkyevil . . .


Time:2005-09-11 00:30:17 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#276151

Parent:#86
Siblings:#87
Children:#89
#88
course a lot of it became clear when the bodyguard didn't die last night


Time:2005-09-11 00:33:59 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#276407

Parent:#88
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #89
Yup. I was totally blind to that. Call it combined newbie inexperience and cupid-induced blindness.


Time:2005-09-11 01:54:20 GMT
Author:[info]girlpurple
Subject:Rule clarification for our GM
Link:14007#276919

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #91 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:#96
#90
I saw the posting over at Miller's Hollow clarifying the Master Rules Set, and am curious about how the AFFLICTED notification was/is being carried out here.

Is it consistent with the amended Miller's Hollow rules? Or was it handled differently this game, and if so, how?

The point is perhaps moot given the last few comments from [info]parzanese and [info]princeofwands, but I'd like verification that if I HAVE been turned, I won't find out until AFTER today's lynching.


Time:2005-09-11 01:58:03 GMT
Author:[info]girlpurple
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#277431

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #93 #99 #108 #115
Children:(none)
 #91
unvote gpeefault vote [info]daedalus4096


Time:2005-09-11 02:26:12 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#277687

Parent:#84
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #92
sorry, i missed the mason claim when i posted this. clearly i'm not going to change any of your minds.


Time:2005-09-11 05:14:35 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#277943

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #99 #108 #115
Children:#97
#93
Christ, I step away for one afternoon and I end up on the gallows... [info]Parzanese is right about one thing: [info]Hungryandhollow and myself are the lovers. I believe my reasons for concealing this should be self-evident. As for the stuff about me being a wolf, however, you're way off.

I am not a wolf, but for the sake of argument, let's say for a moment that I am... Why in God's name would I want to trigger the afflicted? That would just be one more wolf I'd have to get rid of while dodging the suspicion of the rest of you. The witch or the hunter would have been a much better target.

If you all are hellbent on lynching me, there doesn't seem to be much left that I can do about it. Until then, I'm going to side with the only person left that seems to believe me.

Unvote [info]Gpeefalt. Vote [info]Girlpurple.


Time:2005-09-11 07:00:29 GMT
Author:[info]perkyevil
Subject:Yep, we're the Masons.
Link:14007#278199

Parent:#77
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #94
Yeah, all those evening meetings.....


Time:2005-09-11 07:13:50 GMT
Author:[info]gpeefalt
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#278455

Parent:#55
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #95
OK...

unvote [info]princeofwands
vote [info]girlpurple


Time:2005-09-11 18:32:36 GMT
Author:[info]lupusintabula
Subject:Re: Rule clarification for our GM
Link:14007#278711

Parent:#90
Siblings:(none)
Children:#98
#96
When the Afflicted is activated, the Afflicted is the only one notified. Nice try at clearing your name, but I can neither confirm nor deny whether you have recieved this notification. ;)


Time:2005-09-11 21:16:22 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#278967

Parent:#93
Siblings:(none)
Children:#100
#97
dude she voted for you above . . . where'd that belief go? :)

why would you want an afflicted? because it gives you another wolf for the rest of the villagers to hunt down . . . one more person on your side who doesn't know that you're the lover . . . one more valuable ally . . . one more person you can throw to the villagers in order to keep them at bay and you out killing one day longer . . .

if I'm wrong, I apologize, and [info]gpeefalt will pay the price tomorrow . . . but right now, you're my best guess and well a lot of facts just seem to line up against you . . . yes a lot of facts ranging from your claims, your encouragement of the claim game, you're timing of your votes for [info]stride and [info]gnatdbug, the fact that the bodyguard is still alive after outing himself, especially when the wolves probably didn't know he was a lover before making their selection . . .

I'm sorry, just too much points in your direction . . .


Time:2005-09-12 01:46:43 GMT
Author:[info]girlpurple
Subject:Re: Rule clarification for our GM
Link:14007#279223

Parent:#96
Siblings:(none)
Children:#101 #105
#98
Actually, the question is more about WHEN the Afflicted is notified.... immediately after the attack (before the next lynching) or the first night after the attack (after the next round of lynching). That is, in our current game, does the Afflicted now know that they've been turned?


Time:2005-09-12 05:24:09 GMT
Author:[info]flipperchaz
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#279479

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #108 #115
Children:(none)
 #99
Unvote [info]gpeefalt
Vote [info]daedalus4096


Time:2005-09-12 06:19:44 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#279735

Parent:#97
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #100
I said vote with, not vote for. Specifically, I was referring to voting for the same person that [info]Hungryandhollow did.


Time:2005-09-12 15:44:39 GMT
Author:[info]lupusintabula
Subject:Re: Rule clarification for our GM
Link:14007#279991

Parent:#98
Siblings:#105
Children:(none)
 #101
The Afflicted is notified immediately.


Time:2005-09-12 16:28:07 GMT
Author:[info]kraydon
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#280503

Parent:#53
Siblings:#55
Children:#103 #104
#102
I don't buy the "I'm so innocent, I've never played before."

Vote Gpeefault!!!


Time:2005-09-12 17:14:27 GMT
Author:[info]gpeefalt
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#280759

Parent:#102
Siblings:#104
Children:(none)
 #103
But I haven't played before. Honest.
Opinions as to my innocence are another matter. :-)


Time:2005-09-12 17:55:40 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#281271

Parent:#102
Siblings:#103
Children:(none)
 #104
But he isn't going to get lynched today. grilpurple still have the power to swing the vote to tied between herself and [info]daedalus4096.

It's a small thing, but if you get this in time, I'd recommend moving your vote from her to [info]daedalus4096 so that there can't be a last minute vote swing.


Time:2005-09-12 18:05:57 GMT
Author:[info]lupusintabula
Subject:Re: Rule clarification for our GM
Link:14007#281527

Parent:#98
Siblings:#101
Children:#106 #107
#105
I believe this is the same timing that [info]millershollow uses. The [info]millershollow rules clarifications only talked about the timing of that notification to the other Werewolves. It didn't speak about the how quickly that information is passed to the Afflicted.


Time:2005-09-12 18:18:52 GMT
Author:[info]girlpurple
Subject:Re: Rule clarification for our GM
Link:14007#281783

Parent:#105
Siblings:#107
Children:(none)
 #106
Ah, OK. I think I've got it now. Thanks for the clarification on how to read that section. :-)


Time:2005-09-12 18:24:00 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:Re: Rule clarification for our GM
Link:14007#282039

Parent:#105
Siblings:#106
Children:(none)
 #107
yes, the afflicted is notified immediately that they've turned, the wolves aren't notified until it's time to eat again and another wolf shows up at the dinner table . . .


Time:2005-09-12 19:07:52 GMT
Author:[info]girlpurple
Subject:Lost Lynching....
Link:14007#283063

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #115
Children:#109
#108
Anyone seen a missin' lynchin'? The angry mob is restless...


Time:2005-09-12 19:31:39 GMT
Author:[info]parzanese
Subject:Re: Lost Lynching....
Link:14007#283319

Parent:#108
Siblings:(none)
Children:#110 #113
#109
hey [info]joelzero get a move on will ya :) we got lynching to do!!


Time:2005-09-12 19:48:20 GMT
Author:[info]princeofwands
Subject:Re: Lost Lynching....
Link:14007#283575

Parent:#109
Siblings:#113
Children:#111 #112
#110
There's two new lj-entries that were created today but none that I can see, and Joel's IM window reports idle from shortly after 11. My guess is that he HAS posted already (once for the lynching results and once for the wolves) and then took off and that there's some filtering problem that's resulted in us villagers with nothing to see and it may or may not apply to the wolf post, too.

The only good argument against this theory is that comments to this post aren't screened yet.


Time:2005-09-12 20:06:47 GMT
Author:[info]ragnarok_now
Subject:Re: Lost Lynching....
Link:14007#283831

Parent:#110
Siblings:#112
Children:(none)
 #111
As a watcher I am seeing two position-specific posts, but no 'new day'. Based on the responses to such the game should continue, assuming the innkeeper awakes from his nap.


Time:2005-09-12 20:12:40 GMT
Author:[info]flipperchaz
Subject:Re: Lost Lynching....
Link:14007#284087

Parent:#110
Siblings:#111
Children:(none)
 #112
Just heard from Amy that he has not yet posted. Just a really busy day at work.


Time:2005-09-12 21:18:51 GMT
Author:[info]daedalus4096
Subject:Re: Lost Lynching....
Link:14007#284599

Parent:#109
Siblings:#110
Children:#114
#113
It's bad enough you all are planning on lynching me, but making me wait like this is just mean!


Time:2005-09-12 21:28:29 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:Re: Lost Lynching....
Link:14007#285111

Parent:#113
Siblings:(none)
Children:(none)
 #114
I love you, baby. We had a good run.


Time:2005-09-12 21:30:12 GMT
Author:[info]hungryandhollow
Subject:(none)
Link:14007#285367

Parent:(none)
Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #7 #19 #35 #44 #49 #54 #58 #70 #75 #76 #77 #81 #90 #91 #93 #99 #108
Children:(none)
 #115
Next round, by God, I'm staying single. I need time to myself, people!


Vote History
[info]princeofwandsvote[info]gpeefalt2005-09-09 19:36:49 GMT#6
[info]daedalus4096vote[info]perkyevil2005-09-09 19:39:48 GMT#9
[info]gpeefaltvote[info]princeofwands2005-09-09 19:54:11 GMT#22
[info]flipperchazunvote[info]duck2005-09-09 20:26:12 GMT#34
[info]flipperchazvote[info]gpeefalt2005-09-09 20:26:12 GMT#34
[info]girlpurplevote[info]gpeefalt2005-09-09 22:14:49 GMT#49
[info]gpeefaltunvote[info]princeofwands2005-09-09 22:30:10 GMT#53
[info]daedalus4096unvote[info]perkyevil2005-09-09 22:44:56 GMT#54
[info]daedalus4096vote[info]gpeefalt2005-09-09 22:44:56 GMT#54
[info]parzanesevote[info]daedalus40962005-09-10 17:48:07 GMT#75
[info]princeofwandsunvote[info]gpeefalt2005-09-10 18:51:51 GMT#78
[info]princeofwandsvote[info]daedalus40962005-09-10 18:51:51 GMT#78
[info]perkyevilvote[info]daedalus40962005-09-10 19:51:05 GMT#79
[info]parzanesevote[info]daedalus40962005-09-10 20:50:44 GMT#80daedalus
[info]hungryandhollowvote[info]girlpurple2005-09-10 22:15:16 GMT#81
[info]hungryandhollowvote[info]girlpurple2005-09-10 22:15:16 GMT#81
[info]girlpurpleunvote[info]gpeefalt2005-09-11 01:58:03 GMT#91gpeefault
[info]girlpurplevote[info]daedalus40962005-09-11 01:58:03 GMT#91
[info]daedalus4096unvote[info]gpeefalt2005-09-11 05:14:35 GMT#93
[info]daedalus4096vote[info]girlpurple2005-09-11 05:14:35 GMT#93
[info]gpeefaltunvote[info]princeofwands2005-09-11 07:13:50 GMT#95
[info]gpeefaltvote[info]girlpurple2005-09-11 07:13:50 GMT#95
[info]flipperchazunvote[info]gpeefalt2005-09-12 05:24:09 GMT#99
[info]flipperchazvote[info]daedalus40962005-09-12 05:24:09 GMT#99
[info]kraydonvote[info]gpeefalt2005-09-12 16:28:07 GMT#102gpeefault
Vote Summary
5 against[info]daedalus4096:[info]parzanese [info]perkyevil [info]princeofwands [info]flipperchaz [info]girlpurple
3 against[info]girlpurple:[info]daedalus4096 [info]gpeefalt [info]hungryandhollow
1 against[info]gpeefalt:[info]kraydon
Posted but no vote:[info]joelzero [info]lupusintabula [info]ragnarok_now
Posting Statistics
posts by[info]princeofwands:(28)#4 #6 #10 #15 #17 #23 #27 #29 #30 #32 #33 #39 #40 #42 #46 #56 #57 #63 #65 #67 #74 #78 #82 #85 #86 #89 #104 #110
posts by[info]daedalus4096:(18)#1 #2 #9 #14 #16 #20 #25 #28 #31 #36 #37 #38 #54 #55 #62 #93 #100 #113
posts by[info]parzanese:(16)#58 #59 #60 #61 #64 #75 #76 #77 #80 #83 #84 #87 #88 #97 #107 #109
posts by[info]hungryandhollow:(14)#7 #8 #12 #13 #35 #41 #44 #45 #66 #69 #81 #92 #114 #115
posts by[info]lupusintabula:(9)#18 #21 #26 #43 #50 #71 #96 #101 #105
posts by[info]flipperchaz:(9)#5 #11 #19 #24 #34 #72 #73 #99 #112
posts by[info]girlpurple:(9)#3 #48 #49 #68 #90 #91 #98 #106 #108
posts by[info]gpeefalt:(6)#22 #51 #52 #53 #95 #103
posts by[info]perkyevil:(3)#70 #79 #94
posts by[info]kraydon:(1)#102
posts by[info]ragnarok_now:(1)#111
posts by[info]joelzero:(1)#47
Comment Tree Summary