Please only living players vote in the poll. When enough people vote yes, a separate post will open to decide who the first sheriff of Millers Hollow will be.
| Time:2009-09-22 20:36:59 GMT Author: ![[info]](../images/userinfo.gif){kind=small} baronlawSubject:(none) Link:162802#2542834 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#7 #8 #13 #14 #15 Children:#2 #12 |
#1 | |
| Werewolves will first try to get a no vote for the sheriff and then if they fail at that attempt to get one of their own elected. SO watch who votes no and then watch who they want elected to the spot if it passes instead. | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 20:47:05 GMT Author: snoopyh42Subject:(none) Link:162802#2545906 | Parent:#1 Siblings:#12 Children:#3 |
#2 | |
| I just think that voting for a sheriff is premature at this time. | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 20:53:55 GMT Author: baronlawSubject:(none) Link:162802#2546930 | Parent:#2 Siblings:(none) Children:#4 #5 |
#3 | |
| I think you are a serial killer or a werewolf. How can voting in a protector of the people be premature? | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 20:55:22 GMT Author: snoopyh42Subject:(none) Link:162802#2547954 | Parent:#3 Siblings:#5 Children:(none) |
#4 | |
| I'm all for a protector, but I think it too likely at this juncture that we may elect a werewolf or a serial killer by mistake. | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 20:58:26 GMT Author: slojaeSubject:(none) Link:162802#2548722 | Parent:#3 Siblings:#4 Children:#6 |
#5 | |
| some people my have seen george bush as "a protector" we don't need one of those in millers hollow.... | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 20:59:18 GMT Author: baronlawSubject:(none) Link:162802#2548978 | Parent:#5 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#6 | |
| Well that's made my mind up, thanks. | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 21:51:09 GMT Author: gwydion82Subject:(none) Link:162802#2554866 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #8 #13 #14 #15 Children:(none) |
#7 | |
| right now, the only options are : A) 2 votes for a serial killer, who wants to kill everyone B) 2 votes for the seer, who may or may not C) 2 votes for a wolf, that only wants to kill villagers D) 2 votes for a special character, that has no idea who the wolves might be, other than speculation. E) 2 votes for a regular villager, that has no ideal who the wolves might be, other than speculation. | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 22:04:40 GMT Author: camblerSubject:(none) Link:162802#2555122 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #7 #13 #14 #15 Children:#9 |
#8 | |
| I vote yes because it has one more letter than no. If elected to the post, I will gladly serve. Please don't vote for me. | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 22:08:16 GMT Author: ophiomancerSubject:(none) Link:162802#2555634 | Parent:#8 Siblings:(none) Children:#10 |
#9 | |
| A bit over-eager, are we? It doesn't even look like the vote for a sheriff is going to pass and you're already nominating yourself. | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 22:12:59 GMT Author: camblerSubject:(none) Link:162802#2556146 | Parent:#9 Siblings:(none) Children:#11 |
#10 | |
| Yes, and then telling people not to vote for me. This is my way of saying that this early in the game it is 100% irrelevant. | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 22:14:01 GMT Author: ophiomancerSubject:(none) Link:162802#2556658 | Parent:#10 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#11 | |
| Ah, I took that as don't vote to lynch you. My mistake. ;) | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 22:17:12 GMT Author: strideSubject:(none) Link:162802#2556914 | Parent:#1 Siblings:#2 Children:(none) |
#12 | |
I do not see how electing a sheriff on the second day will help. An extra vote would not have saved ![[info]](../images/gorillashaman.gif){kind=small} gorillashaman with half of the village voting to lynch him. What is the purpose? | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 22:51:34 GMT Author: sonicbunnySubject:(none) Link:162802#2560754 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #7 #8 #14 #15 Children:(none) |
#13 | |
| I think we need a sheriff and I think we need to elect one while there are enuf of us alive to make a good choice. Just don't elect me, I always get slaughtered by day three anyway, the last thing I need is a big target painted on my butt! | |||
| Time:2009-09-22 23:35:49 GMT Author: starryshadowsSubject:(none) Link:162802#2564082 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #7 #8 #13 #15 Children:(none) |
#14 | |
| My logic in voting yes is fairly simple. Yes, the sheriff DOES get two votes, and if the wolves get it, it's bad. But I've seen nothing here that says we can't lynch the sheriff. Right now, mob rule seems to be the order fo the day; there hasn't yet been a situation in which one vote would matter. Personally, I watch how the sheriff votes, and if no wolves are getting caught, then remove him as a collaborator. This seems simple enough to me, and I fail to see how it's such a terrible idea that people so vehemently oppose it. It frankly sheds a bit of suspicion on those who ARE vehementaly opposing it; what if we get a sheriff elected and then those people who opposed it ![[info]](../images/abstain.gif){kind=small} abstain, or start vigorously lobbying for certain folks? Can you say wolf detector? | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 10:04:47 GMT Author: slojaeSubject:(none) Link:162802#2572530 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #7 #8 #13 #14 Children:(none) |
#15 | |
| nd someone based his wanting to lynch me on an anti-bush statement... looks like you'll see whats commin to you byt the votes so far | |||
Posting Statistics
| posts by | baronlaw | : | (3) | #1 #3 #6 |
| posts by | slojae | : | (2) | #5 #15 |
| posts by | cambler | : | (2) | #8 #10 |
| posts by | ophiomancer | : | (2) | #9 #11 |
| posts by | snoopyh42 | : | (2) | #2 #4 |
| posts by | starryshadows | : | (1) | #14 |
| posts by | stride | : | (1) | #12 |
| posts by | gwydion82 | : | (1) | #7 |
| posts by | sonicbunny | : | (1) | #13 |
Comment Tree Summary