millershollow - Day 3 |
| Link:165096 Sat Jan 23 00:18:23 2010 |
| Time:2009-09-23 18:46:16 GMT Author: Subject:Curiouser and curiouser Link:165096#2584808 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#30 |
#1 | |
| Interesting developments indeed ... | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 18:47:01 GMT Author: Subject:Status Link:165096#2585320 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#8 #10 #34 #35 |
#2 | |
| LIVING: DEAD: Special roles remaining: Wolves (x3) Seer Witch Afflicted Hunter Bodyguard Martyr Ghost Serial Killer | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 18:48:12 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2585576 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#3 | |
| Wow, the Serial Killer got a wolf. Sweet! | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 18:48:15 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2585832 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#4 | |
| Looks like our serial killer did us a favor last night. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 18:48:22 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2586088 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#7 |
#5 | |
| Hooray! Someone killed a wolf! That means that there's still three of you out there... | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:04:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2586856 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#9 #16 |
#6 | |
| Interesting. Chessie didn't post much yesterday, so there's not much to go on there. She voted for slonewsday, but by that time, it was mostly a throw-away, since | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:11:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2587624 | Parent:#5 Siblings:(none) Children:#11 |
#7 | |
| And an afflicted. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:15:56 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2587880 | Parent:#2 Siblings:#10 #34 #35 Children:#20 #58 #68 #75 #105 |
#8 | |
| the baker. the waffles. the custard. the scone. the candy. hmmm | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:17:02 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2588136 | Parent:#6 Siblings:#16 Children:#12 |
#9 | |
| so you're suggesting that may have been a cover? | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:20:07 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2588392 | Parent:#2 Siblings:#8 #34 #35 Children:#23 |
#10 | |
| we're even between specials and villagers... does this mean we'll actually survive this time? | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:20:14 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2588648 | Parent:#7 Siblings:(none) Children:#44 |
#11 | |
| And a serial killer. They may have done us a favor this night, but we're all at risk while they run free. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:20:35 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2588904 | Parent:#9 Siblings:(none) Children:#13 |
#12 | |
| Yeah, I guess I am.. that Chessie voted for her doesn't clear her ( But it's a pretty light suggestion, with not much to back it up. Not enough for me to put a vote behind it. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:23:45 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2589160 | Parent:#12 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#13 | |
| Yep - I had been analyzing the same thing and had come to similar conclusions. The lack of data combined with the REQUIREMENT to speculate is ... frustrating. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:26:29 GMT Author: Subject:Well now. Link:165096#2589416 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#27 |
#14 | |
| Nothing much to go on. I figured Looks like we're back to I'm gonna VOTE Back to the salt mines. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:29:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2589672 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#15 | |
| well someone has to get the ball rolling... and studying the list of active players there is one who never posted yesterday... trying to keep quiet so no one will notice they're even playing perhaps? vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:29:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2589928 | Parent:#6 Siblings:#9 Children:#17 #22 |
#16 | |
| I know we're just grasping at straws, here, but notice that while Vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:43:58 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2590184 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#22 Children:#18 #25 |
#17 | |
| I was thinking the same thing. Plus, by Vote slonewsday. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 19:50:14 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2590440 | Parent:#17 Siblings:#25 Children:(none) |
#18 | |
| Although Vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:12:57 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2590696 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#24 #29 #39 |
#19 | |
| You know, this is interesting, because I was sure that I was going to be killed or eaten last night, given that there is a core group of people who keep voting for me to be lynched for really no good reason. I think that among these people are either a werewolf or the serial killer. In particular, I'd like to challenge I stated that waffles kill, which we have seen to be true. I suggested we eat nasty-tasting things like brussel sprouts, spinach or sour kraut to make ourselves less tasty to those who might eat us and therefor giving us a better chance of living another night. BUT! He voted for me to be lynched, and therein lies the snare. I was trustworthy enough that he decided to take my advice...but then UNtrustworthy enough to lynch? Which is it, And isn't it just a little odd that to keep the beasties away you eat....sardines? My cat loves sardines. My dogs loved sardines. Sardines are not a deterrent to animals, they are a tasty snack. It doesn't add up, people. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:19:50 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2590952 | Parent:#8 Siblings:#58 #68 #75 #105 Children:#43 #53 |
#20 | |
| She has a theory....it could be bunnies... | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:20:15 GMT Author: Subject:My take Link:165096#2591208 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#28 |
#21 | |
| Well, let's get my opinion on this rolling. I'm very suspicious of Gwydion at the moment. His opinions at the start of the game made me a little suspicious, and his voting record has been nothing other than bandwagonning. Yes, he's a new player, but I think that I'm going to take a first step, and VOTE | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:20:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2591464 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#17 Children:(none) |
#22 | |
| Agreed. vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:25:31 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2591720 | Parent:#10 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#23 | |
| I'll sleep a lot more soundly when we are sans a couple more. Digging for little logic help I can find now. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:26:07 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2591976 | Parent:#19 Siblings:#29 #39 Children:#26 #42 |
#24 | |
| the wolves don't eat you, because they're sure we villagers will lynch you soon anyway. They are likely to eat people with fewer votes as often as possible, unless they are specifically gunning for the serial killer, which they don't need to based on the numbers yet. We need to keep an eye on those without many votes, or those that get a lot of votes, but then get saved by a "dogpile" later. Well, more to the point, we need to not be deterred from one target to another, because the math is still the same, and only the desires of the wolves to trick us remains. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:30:07 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2592232 | Parent:#17 Siblings:#18 Children:#49 |
#25 | |
| I'd sy that | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:34:07 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2592488 | Parent:#24 Siblings:#42 Children:(none) |
#26 | |
| I will have a response for this after there has been a bit more discussion today. ;) | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:35:21 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Well now. Link:165096#2592744 | Parent:#14 Siblings:(none) Children:#31 |
#27 | |
| I'll sleep a lot more soundly when we are sans a couple more. Digging for little logic help I can find now. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:35:58 GMT Author: Subject:Re: My take Link:165096#2593000 | Parent:#21 Siblings:(none) Children:#32 #33 |
#28 | |
| true, I don't have enough of a track record to go by. My voting was band wagoning, because I the two that have been removed thus far are dangerous when with the wolves, from the games I have read up on in preparation. Had I been a wolf, I would have followed suit with | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:46:12 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2593256 | Parent:#19 Siblings:#24 #39 Children:#36 |
#29 | |
| why does this make me think of a scene from the princess bride... something about never getting involved in a land war in asia... | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:46:29 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Curiouser and curiouser Link:165096#2593512 | Parent:#1 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#30 | |
| Indeed. The Ralph Well, the good news is one wolf less, anyway! | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:48:20 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Well now. Link:165096#2593768 | Parent:#27 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#31 | |
| Logic would be nice. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:49:21 GMT Author: Subject:Re: My take Link:165096#2594024 | Parent:#28 Siblings:#33 Children:(none) |
#32 | |
| hey i got taken out by the serial killer on day 2 my first time around I'm happy to survive past day 3 this time...8) | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:49:55 GMT Author: Subject:Re: My take Link:165096#2594280 | Parent:#28 Siblings:#32 Children:#150 |
#33 | |
| Lynch me if you must, but, since it is my first time, I would like to make it a little deeper into the game. But that is exactly what a werewolf would say! | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:56:02 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2594536 | Parent:#2 Siblings:#8 #10 #35 Children:(none) |
#34 | |
| One more useful summary. Adam's scripts note total posts, but they do not identify players that haven't posted at all. So, here are the surviving players and their total number of posts Days 1 and 2, sorted descending. 1 2 2 4 5 6 8 8 8 8 9 10 10 11 11 12 13 13 14 15 19 28 42 So we have no silent players, but we do have some very quiet ones. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:57:27 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2594792 | Parent:#2 Siblings:#8 #10 #34 Children:#63 #70 |
#35 | |
| *VOTE I am still pretty strongly bothered by the listings. And it has been a wolf telling me its not before. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:59:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2595048 | Parent:#29 Siblings:(none) Children:#45 |
#36 | |
| Bahaha ;D | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 20:59:56 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2595304 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#37 | |
| hey mr/mrs serial killer... did you get a look at the other wolves sneaking off after killing | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:03:23 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2595560 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#40 #41 |
#38 | |
| Well, interesting developments. I'm hesitant to vote for On the other hand, I really have no other leads, and | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:03:49 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2595816 | Parent:#19 Siblings:#24 #29 Children:#50 #56 |
#39 | |
| To be frank, I was expecting to see my name on the dead list this morning, which would have keenly pointed the finger of everyone's ire at you. As it is, my suspicion is eased a bit today. As for the accusation of eating things that animals like, I've never in my life met a cat or dog who enjoyed waffles, crepes, or scones, especially smothered in sugar, fruit, and syrup. These wolves are obviously far from typical palates. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:06:53 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2596584 | Parent:#38 Siblings:#41 Children:#46 #47 |
#40 | |
| I think in the rules it says that if a player doesn't vote for two consecutive days they get booted. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:07:59 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2596840 | Parent:#38 Siblings:#40 Children:(none) |
#41 | |
| I feel the same way about As for Back to square one with most of my reasoning, it seems... | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:08:29 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2597096 | Parent:#24 Siblings:#26 Children:#81 |
#42 | |
| that's assuming he/she's not a wolf him/herself... he/she would not be on the menu if he/she was a guest at the table. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:12:05 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2597352 | Parent:#20 Siblings:#53 Children:(none) |
#43 | |
| *grin* | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:14:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2597608 | Parent:#11 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#44 | |
| I was thinking that same thing. I wonder if we can start examining victims and thus deduce anything that way? Probably too early, but... No votes from the latter, only one from the former... I think this is all still too tangled. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:17:06 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2597864 | Parent:#36 Siblings:(none) Children:#60 |
#45 | |
| *grin* I swear, if | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:18:08 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2598120 | Parent:#40 Siblings:#47 Children:#51 |
#46 | |
| Doesn't vote or doesn't post? | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:18:33 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2598376 | Parent:#40 Siblings:#46 Children:#48 |
#47 | |
| oh my god your icon i just noticed it and now i am lol'ing | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:19:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2598632 | Parent:#47 Siblings:(none) Children:#55 |
#48 | |
| >:D I am making a better one right now. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:21:32 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2598888 | Parent:#25 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#49 | |
| In active people eventually commit suicide in this town. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:22:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2599144 | Parent:#39 Siblings:#56 Children:#54 |
#50 | |
| Wow, you need to meet my pets then because my cat is a marshmallow whore. :) | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:24:38 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2599400 | Parent:#46 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#51 | |
| Doesn't vote. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:26:56 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2599656 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#65 |
#52 | |
| Given the villagers that have been executed thus far, I'm really not sure which way to turn. But because it's already been established that she's evil anyway... vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:27:18 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2599912 | Parent:#20 Siblings:#43 Children:(none) |
#53 | |
| :D | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:32:54 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2600424 | Parent:#50 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#54 | |
| I stand corrected. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:33:11 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2600680 | Parent:#48 Siblings:(none) Children:#117 |
#55 | |
| Buah hah hah hah. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:41:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2601448 | Parent:#39 Siblings:#50 Children:#116 |
#56 | |
| Also, you were baiting me? That seems an awfully convenient excuse to cover up an obvious slip-up. "Oh no, I did that on purpose!" That excuse never flies. It seems to me that you were talking to so many different people that you forgot what you were saying from one post to another. It's difficult to keep track of a lie sometimes, isn't it? Whereas I have been consistent this entire time. And of course it looked suspicious. It was meant to. The wolves obviously tried to frame me so the villagers would turn their wrath on me at some point, and then the wolves would gladly add their votes to the dogpile. Like I said earlier -- not a risk taker, don't like chances, cunning like a blunt hammer. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:47:08 GMT Author: Subject:okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2601704 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#59 #61 #62 #64 #66 #151 |
#57 | |
I'm concerned. If A policy of, they didn't post yesterday, lynch them, doesn't strike me as all that effective in ferreting out a wolf. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:50:32 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2602216 | Parent:#8 Siblings:#20 #68 #75 #105 Children:(none) |
#58 | |
| Hey now! It was probably witches, evil witches! | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 21:58:01 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2602728 | Parent:#57 Siblings:#61 #62 #64 #66 #151 Children:(none) |
#59 | |
| ferreting out a wolf....i don't know why that phrase made me laugh. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:01:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2602984 | Parent:#45 Siblings:(none) Children:#69 #72 |
#60 | |
| unless ophiomncer is a wolf/cereal killer... then we will have guessed correctly | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:01:32 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2603240 | Parent:#57 Siblings:#59 #62 #64 #66 #151 Children:#67 #205 |
#61 | |
| "I agree. A vote for I think in the end, even if I vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:02:48 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2603496 | Parent:#57 Siblings:#59 #61 #64 #66 #151 Children:(none) |
#62 | |
| Call me crazy, but that actually sounds like good logic. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:06:15 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2603752 | Parent:#35 Siblings:#70 Children:(none) |
#63 | |
| I'm not sure why.. but both yesterday and today the other website hasn't been registering your votes... maybe its the * connected to it... | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:06:27 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2604008 | Parent:#57 Siblings:#59 #61 #62 #66 #151 Children:(none) |
#64 | |
| This is true. Unvote I | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:16:22 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2604264 | Parent:#52 Siblings:(none) Children:#71 |
#65 | |
| Not a wolf! And I warned you not to google David Hasselhoff and Spongebob... | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:17:18 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2604520 | Parent:#57 Siblings:#59 #61 #62 #64 #151 Children:(none) |
#66 | |
| I agree. Lynching someone who would otherwise commit suicide does seem like a wasted vote. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:17:47 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2604776 | Parent:#61 Siblings:#205 Children:#77 |
#67 | |
| If you'd like to discuss important facts, then by all means, discuss. Thus far, all you've done is vote with no discussion whatsoever. The only reason people aren't looking at you is because you make an average post of ONE per day, and like I said, that's only to vote. For all we know, you're one of the baddies who's pointing the finger at the loudest target while not contributing to the debate at all. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:18:29 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2605032 | Parent:#8 Siblings:#20 #58 #75 #105 Children:(none) |
#68 | |
| It's the starches and sugar! | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:19:43 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2605288 | Parent:#60 Siblings:#72 Children:(none) |
#69 | |
| cereal killer... *facepalm* Is that why there is always food at the murder scenes? | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:22:31 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2605544 | Parent:#35 Siblings:#63 Children:(none) |
#70 | |
| I noticed that too. You need to leave out the asterisks. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:23:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2605800 | Parent:#65 Siblings:(none) Children:#84 |
#71 | |
| Yes, but you know that's like an engraved invitation. You should know by now that I can't resist a taunt like that. And I, by now, should know better than to fall for it. Hence, why I'm not falling for your "Not a wolf" act. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:27:40 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2606312 | Parent:#60 Siblings:#69 Children:#73 |
#72 | |
| Cereal...killer... *head-desk* *snort* *giggle* Okay, I'm better now. No, not the cereal killer. I quite like cereal. Especially Raisin Bran Crunch. ;) | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:29:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2606568 | Parent:#72 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#73 | |
| Ah, so it's not that you don't like waffles, it's just that you prefer simpler breakfasts? | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:31:50 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2606824 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#76 |
#74 | |
| I would like to point out that I totally did NOT make a coat out of any tentacle-based corpses. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:33:20 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2607080 | Parent:#8 Siblings:#20 #58 #68 #105 Children:#198 |
#75 | |
| Here's an idea seperate from but along the same lines of "cereal killer": There is always food at the crime scene, so maybe the serial killer is...hungry. *eyes Just throwing the idea out there. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:34:17 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2607336 | Parent:#74 Siblings:(none) Children:#79 |
#76 | |
| in fact: vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:37:55 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2607592 | Parent:#67 Siblings:(none) Children:#80 |
#77 | |
| "For all we know, you're one of the baddies who's pointing the finger at the loudest target while not contributing to the debate at all." The loudest, most aggressive target who always seems to be attacking someone over some crazy thing. Sounds like something a wolf would do. vote Now to make a hat out of dead werewolf to enhance my fashion. Cupid coat + Werewolf hat = FABULOUS! | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:37:56 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2607848 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#85 |
#78 | |
| Good points. UNVOTE | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:42:15 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2608104 | Parent:#76 Siblings:(none) Children:#87 #258 |
#79 | |
| I'm content with you creating a rivalry with me. I do, however, suggest a FASHION rivalry! With a walk-off to decide the winner. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:46:50 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2608360 | Parent:#77 Siblings:(none) Children:#82 |
#80 | |
| Heh heh heh. Hey, This is just SO uncharacteristic of me. :D Good special, bad special, wolf or villager, I'd be doing this no matter what I was, it's just how I am. ^_^ So you really can't rely on the loud bit. Not being loud and aggressive would be like me trying to walk like a dainty flower without running into door frames. It's just not gonna happen. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:49:05 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2608616 | Parent:#42 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#81 | |
| She. :) | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:52:28 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2608872 | Parent:#80 Siblings:(none) Children:#83 |
#82 | |
| "Well, we really only have your word on that and at the moment, your word is suspect. I have been fairly quiet, yes. I, like many others, have never lived in this village before. However, I won't be cowed into being needlessly verbose just to cast off suspicion. In fact, going after the quiet ones would be excellent for all the loud and aggressive folks, wouldn't it? My vote stands." | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 22:59:21 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2609128 | Parent:#82 Siblings:(none) Children:#88 |
#83 | |
| Not going after you, bub. In fact, this is the first time I've even looked at you. You accused me, I counter-argued. This is not "going after". It's debate. And there is a difference between "needlessly verbose" and contributing to the discussion, which thus far, you really haven't. Are you afraid to give something away from talking too much so you're going the complete opposite route? Join the debate or continue to skulk about under the radar, your choice. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:01:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2609384 | Parent:#71 Siblings:(none) Children:#86 |
#84 | |
| "I'm not convinced | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:04:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2609640 | Parent:#78 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#85 | |
| "It most assurdely is a wolf ruse. Tricky beasts, werewolves. Do the village a favor, Ben. Kill a beast by voting for | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:05:05 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2609896 | Parent:#84 Siblings:(none) Children:#90 |
#86 | |
| I've been voting for | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:05:38 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2610152 | Parent:#79 Siblings:#258 Children:#89 #94 |
#87 | |
| Like this? | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:11:16 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2610408 | Parent:#83 Siblings:(none) Children:#95 #113 |
#88 | |
| "By your very words you are attempting to raise suspicion of me. Words like 'skulk' imply negativity to my actions. 'Under the radar' sets the impression I have something to hide. Framing and spin doctoring-- the tools of admen, politicians, and beasts of hell! Be clear, | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:14:59 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2610664 | Parent:#87 Siblings:#94 Children:#121 |
#89 | |
| Don't click it! | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:20:08 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2610920 | Parent:#86 Siblings:(none) Children:#93 |
#90 | |
| "Be the voice of reason with me, | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:21:06 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2611176 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#92 #115 |
#91 | |
| In the light of so much pastries, I ask the mayor, where is the pastry shop. Also who is the butcher, and the candlestick maker. I hear a song coming on.... | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:23:00 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2611432 | Parent:#91 Siblings:#115 Children:#100 |
#92 | |
| Werewolves of Miller's Hollow: The Musical | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:23:19 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2611688 | Parent:#90 Siblings:(none) Children:#96 #99 #129 |
#93 | |
| Okay, unvote vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:26:35 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2611944 | Parent:#87 Siblings:#89 Children:#97 |
#94 | |
| not quite tentacles... but quite scarey all the same | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:27:43 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2612200 | Parent:#88 Siblings:#113 Children:#101 |
#95 | |
| Beasts of hell? Slay him? Sheesh, I may be a bit over-enthusiastic about this whole thing, but that's just outright hostile. Hey, Seer person. You might want to have a look at this one. He's trying wayyyy too hard. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:28:33 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2612456 | Parent:#93 Siblings:#99 #129 Children:(none) |
#96 | |
| "Thank you. I am aware there are risks with any strategy, but I do truly believe him to be a werewolf. Besides, making very few comments has aroused suspicion already, so I might as well go with my gut." | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:28:58 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2612712 | Parent:#94 Siblings:(none) Children:#103 |
#97 | |
| Best I could find (and I can't Photoshop safely from work), but replace the Kermit dolls with plushie cthulhus and I think you'll have something that will scare pretty much everyone... | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:33:16 GMT Author: Subject:Regarding Faymar Link:165096#2613224 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#107 #265 |
#98 | |
| You sir, keep joking about skinning people and wearing their skins... I find this disturbing. And, lacking any better evidence at this point, I will go with my anti-furry bias. Also, you have a two syllable name starting with "f" and thats never good. :) vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:36:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2613480 | Parent:#93 Siblings:#96 #129 Children:(none) |
#99 | |
| It is impossible that he's the Seer. I'm not a wolf. And *hands on hips, watching this whole thing with mild disbelief* Either he's on Team Bad somehow or he's going off the deep end lobbying to lynch the wrong person. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:43:49 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2613736 | Parent:#92 Siblings:(none) Children:#106 |
#100 | |
| Now I have werewolves of london stuck in my head. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:43:51 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2613992 | Parent:#95 Siblings:(none) Children:#104 #109 #111 |
#101 | |
| See? A person can't win with you--you don't like it when they don't talk, you don't like it when they do... Fickle! | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:47:39 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2614248 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#102 | |
| in the spirit of not nominating inactive players i will unvote I am entertained by this madness between one of them is most likely on the side of furry, or so it would seem so... for now vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:51:40 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2615016 | Parent:#97 Siblings:(none) Children:#112 |
#103 | |
| Like these ones? http://www.warehouse23.com/item.html?id=SJG9403 | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:52:05 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2615272 | Parent:#101 Siblings:#109 #111 Children:#120 |
#104 | |
| "Here, here! This is exactly the type of thing I'm talking about. On the off chance that | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:52:09 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2615528 | Parent:#8 Siblings:#20 #58 #68 #75 Children:(none) |
#105 | |
| Vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:52:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2615784 | Parent:#100 Siblings:(none) Children:#108 |
#106 | |
| i guess she is evil... if not a wolf... LOL | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:55:30 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Regarding Faymar Link:165096#2616296 | Parent:#98 Siblings:#265 Children:#110 |
#107 | |
| 1) I'm the one skinning the deceased and wearing them. It's a proven defensive strategy. 2) Where do you get furry out of that? You're starting to scare me. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:57:08 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2616552 | Parent:#106 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#108 | |
| I help! | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:57:16 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2616808 | Parent:#101 Siblings:#104 #111 Children:#119 #127 |
#109 | |
| *grin* It's a problem. ;) Really, it's just more than a little ironic and hypocritical that he accuses me of being so aggressive in the way I've been pointing out peoples inconsistencies, and then when I bring to light the fact that he hasn't joined the debate and therefore is an unknown to the rest of us, he goes full-throttle with KILL THE BEAST! I pointed out this sort of thing with starryshadow and he counter-argued with some good points that I in turn counter-argued right back. I point out an even lesser issue with Tell me that doesn't seem off to you. | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:58:05 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Regarding Faymar Link:165096#2617320 | Parent:#107 Siblings:(none) Children:#123 |
#110 | |
| i think he means fur-ry fay-mar flo-wen | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:58:26 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2617576 | Parent:#101 Siblings:#104 #109 Children:(none) |
#111 | |
| And actually, I do like it when they do, which is why I brought it up at all. ;) | |||
| Time:2009-09-23 23:58:54 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2617832 | Parent:#103 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#112 | |
| No pink! Pink is too girly!!! | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:11:48 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2618088 | Parent:#88 Siblings:#95 Children:#114 |
#113 | |
| him? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:14:51 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2618344 | Parent:#113 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#114 | |
| Well, foo on me. I should have checked the the journal. Doesn't change a thing for me, though. Thanks for pointing out the sex confusion. :) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:17:32 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2618600 | Parent:#91 Siblings:#92 Children:#118 |
#115 | |
| Down a dark alley way, a dingy and run down shop stood, covered in soot and surrounded by trash. A crude mispelled sign above the door said, "Paste-rees", some of the letters written backwards. The door opened up and at first it appeared that no one walked out. Then as you scanned down, you see the top of a chef's hat, sitting on the white feathered head of a "Quack!" the | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:18:46 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2618856 | Parent:#56 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#116 | |
| Fair enough. Except I don't really have much to provide excuses for. You made (ahem, make) me suspicious, so I voted on you, with a secondary benefit of seeing which way you'd react to what I said. It's really quite simple. But your personality quirks (presuming you're not lying like a cunnign wolf) are good to note. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:19:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2619112 | Parent:#55 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#117 | |
| That icon is fantastic. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:20:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2619368 | Parent:#115 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#118 | |
| DON"T EAT THE MUFFINS!! | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:25:49 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2619624 | Parent:#109 Siblings:#127 Children:#200 |
#119 | |
| "I've been voting for you since day one. Your trickery and attempts at obfuscation have been nothing but trouble since the beginning. You dared me to become vocal and I have. Of course you want people to see this as off, but it isn't. I have stood by my vote from the beginning. I have seen the popular vote kill two innocents so far. You challenge is not the only motivating factor in me speaking out. Spin, spin, spin all you want to try to make this look bad on me. People will see the truth of your evil intentions." | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:28:17 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2619880 | Parent:#104 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#120 | |
| Truth be told, I think I've got to stay on this train. My suspicions are lessened, but I haven't anything better to go on. And this anti-waffle bias is a terrible, terrible blow to the culture of our poor town. The So, sorry debate partner, but I'm with | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:30:42 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2620136 | Parent:#89 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#121 | |
| Shit! Too late! My Eyes! | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:32:20 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2620392 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#143 |
#122 | |
| Vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:35:18 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Regarding Faymar Link:165096#2620648 | Parent:#110 Siblings:(none) Children:#264 |
#123 | |
| Well then I'm doomed. I hope to wear as many of you as possible before I go. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:44:18 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2620904 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#125 #126 #204 #213 |
#124 | |
| Dude. If | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:52:28 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2621160 | Parent:#124 Siblings:#126 #204 #213 Children:#128 |
#125 | |
| Oh, I am very, very much not a wolf. The village would make a mistake in allowing me to die, by lynching or otherwise. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:56:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2621416 | Parent:#124 Siblings:#125 #204 #213 Children:(none) |
#126 | |
| "Your vote is yours to do with as you please, but I am just staying the course. I said | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:57:27 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2621672 | Parent:#109 Siblings:#119 Children:#130 |
#127 | |
| I took it as more of a roleplaying thing--I mean, we are pretending that we live in a village with werewolves... So, no, it didn't strike me as odd. And, looking at the totals that Like I said, it can seem suspicious from either extreme. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 00:57:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2621928 | Parent:#125 Siblings:(none) Children:#133 |
#128 | |
| "Perhaps if your message was delivered with less hubris, it may have had some merit. I still say you are a foul werewolf from the depths of hell." | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:00:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2622184 | Parent:#93 Siblings:#96 #99 Children:(none) |
#129 | |
| Your vote appears to have not registered. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:07:56 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2622440 | Parent:#127 Siblings:(none) Children:#131 #158 |
#130 | |
| Look at it this way, then. Someone says something contradictory to someting he said earlier. You call him on it. He explains himself and says "didn't do it!" to whatever you're accusing you of. This is a pretty normal response in any situation. Someone is abnormally quiet and only surfaces to point a finger. You call him on it. HE FREAKS OUT and starts a smear campaign all over the place trying to get you killed. Now. Even in a roleplaying situation, this is pretty damn extreme. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:10:48 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2622696 | Parent:#130 Siblings:#158 Children:#132 #160 |
#131 | |
| It's only "extreme" if you think he's trying to do this in real life. Alls fair in love and Werewolf. :) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:15:57 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2623208 | Parent:#131 Siblings:#160 Children:(none) |
#132 | |
| Oh dear. Is this a lover I see? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:16:29 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2623464 | Parent:#128 Siblings:(none) Children:#134 |
#133 | |
| Well, then, I will deliver my message with more clarity for you. Little wolf, I am the Hunter, and if I die, I am taking you with me. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:23:38 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2623720 | Parent:#133 Siblings:(none) Children:#135 |
#134 | |
| "If you be the Hunter, you are bad at it. What evidence do have to offer?" | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:27:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2623976 | Parent:#134 Siblings:(none) Children:#138 #141 |
#135 | |
| Unfortunately, the nature of this game is that there is no evidence. So, the evidence will have to be your corpse when I get lynched. Kinda sucks that way, doesn't it? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:29:09 GMT Author: Subject:IMPORTANT: Seer Link:165096#2624232 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#137 #156 |
#136 | |
| SEER: Once you have 2 wolves and/or 3+ currently living villagers come out (exact numbers up to debate). At that point the bodyguard should protect you for one round, the martyr next, and then finally the bodyguard again. This gives three more scans before you are at risk from wolves. The killer is a random factor, but they don't have any reason to want you dead (in fact, the opposite). | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:31:23 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Seer Link:165096#2624488 | Parent:#136 Siblings:#156 Children:#142 |
#137 | |
| I put 3+ villagers based on the fact that as long as the killer is around and the Seer hidden there is a decent chance of accidental death. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:32:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2624744 | Parent:#135 Siblings:#141 Children:#139 |
#138 | |
| If you're the hunter, using your kill for petty revenge is, well, petty. Your motives and actions are wholly suspect at this point. Even if you are the hunter, I think we're better off without you. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:36:07 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2625000 | Parent:#138 Siblings:(none) Children:#195 |
#139 | |
| It's not petty revenge. He came on way too strong and I think he's one of the bad guys. If he's not, now's the time to prove it to me. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:36:07 GMT Author: Subject:IMPORTANT: Bodyguard and Martyr Link:165096#2625256 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#147 |
#140 | |
| Once the Seer comes out you must protect the Seer in the following order: BODYGUARD MARTYR BODYGUARD Since the Martyr is a one-shot they must not protect first. Do not double-up. The Martyr can freely expose themselves the second turn, but the bodyguard should always remain hidden. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:37:30 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2625512 | Parent:#135 Siblings:#138 Children:(none) |
#141 | |
| "I guess it does and if this is more than just mere blustering and misdirection, I say to you I would be a poor choice to take with you. In the end should we both be dead, it will still be mute testimony to your behavior since the beginning being bad for | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:39:28 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Seer Link:165096#2625768 | Parent:#137 Siblings:(none) Children:#145 |
#142 | |
| Holy crap! Someone in this village has a valid plan! Impressive, good sir. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:39:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2626024 | Parent:#122 Siblings:(none) Children:#144 #149 #175 |
#143 | |
| Ophi is claiming hunter-ship atm, FYI. vote Although honestly neither could be one. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:40:24 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2626280 | Parent:#143 Siblings:#149 #175 Children:(none) |
#144 | |
| Ugh, I mean that neither of them has to be a wolf. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:47:16 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Seer Link:165096#2626536 | Parent:#142 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#145 | |
| Well, | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 01:52:43 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2627048 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#146 | |
| Because apparently I am a noob. VOTE Did that one catch? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 02:02:27 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Bodyguard and Martyr Link:165096#2627304 | Parent:#140 Siblings:(none) Children:#152 #154 #214 #261 |
#147 | |
| actually - bodyguard, witch, bodyguard, martyr, bodyguard - don't throw away the life of a townsperson needlessly! The seer needs to have at least one wolf IDed, in order to show the townfolks he/ she can PROVE that he/ she is the seer. The WOLVES could throw up a false seer and get one nights worth of misdirection, but it wouldn't gain them much, and they would loose one of their 3 members immediately after the ruse (either the false seer OR the "wolf" they sacrifice for proof). The BEST part about this plan is the bguard, the witch, and the martyr remain "hidden" - they don't have to reveal their status at all. Now if one of those specials dies, then the order of protection should change. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 02:10:09 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2627560 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#148 | |
| Vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 02:26:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2627816 | Parent:#143 Siblings:#144 #175 Children:(none) |
#149 | |
| Interesting. Ok, while no-one disputes it... Unvote I | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 02:29:03 GMT Author: Subject:Re: My take Link:165096#2628072 | Parent:#33 Siblings:(none) Children:#153 |
#150 | |
| true, but I'd like to point out that everything someone says is something a wolf might say. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 02:34:31 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2628328 | Parent:#57 Siblings:#59 #61 #62 #64 #66 Children:#155 |
#151 | |
| the odds of the people being a werewolf is slim, and the odds of them being the serial killer is non existent, unless our mayor is killing for him/her. the odds of them being a special or non-special villager is even, and higher than being a "bad guy" I say we DO lynch the people that are inactive. I think it is much more likely that the wolves would like to be active, vs plain villagers, which may slightly skew those averages, anyway. Better to lynch a probable villager than lynch a probable villager, and then lose another to suicide, right? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 02:35:54 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Bodyguard and Martyr Link:165096#2628584 | Parent:#147 Siblings:#154 #214 #261 Children:(none) |
#152 | |
| I was just about to say this. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 02:41:33 GMT Author: Subject:Re: My take Link:165096#2628840 | Parent:#150 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#153 | |
| That sounds like something a wolf would say! (sorry, had to say it) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 02:59:22 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Bodyguard and Martyr Link:165096#2629096 | Parent:#147 Siblings:#152 #214 #261 Children:#164 |
#154 | |
| So... if we have a night of one death or no deaths... How do we know it was a protection and not an activation of the afflicted? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:02:25 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2629352 | Parent:#151 Siblings:(none) Children:#161 |
#155 | |
| I disagree with your logic. It is better to have an active village, than to have ineffective chaff. I voted for Gwydion at the start of the day, and he's done nothing to lessen my suspicions, and more to grow them. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:03:15 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Seer Link:165096#2629608 | Parent:#136 Siblings:#137 Children:#159 #168 #216 |
#156 | |
| the Serial Killer has EVERY reason to want to know who the SEER is. The only person who can REALLY out the Serial Killer is the SEER. And the SEER give NO help to the killer. The killer is required to kill EVERYONE to win. And, the longer the wolves are alive, the more people are killed. He needs the wolves to die, little by little, but he's pretty well off at this point. This leads me to believe you are a BAD character, since you seem to have been much smarter about these things in the previous games, Although I may be misremembering. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:11:56 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2629864 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#162 #166 |
#157 | |
| And just so we're clear since people may not have seen my other post. I AM THE HUNTER. Y'all might not want to lynch me. Yep. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:15:59 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2630120 | Parent:#130 Siblings:#131 Children:(none) |
#158 | |
| "Or maybe, just maybe, I found something in all your rantings that finally convinced me you are absolutely a wolf." | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:17:57 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Seer Link:165096#2630376 | Parent:#156 Siblings:#168 #216 Children:#271 |
#159 | |
| Nope. The Serial Killer would scan as "Villager" to the Seer. The results the Seer gets are "Villager," "Werewolf," or, in some variants, "Werehamster" (and the werehamster dies). | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:18:01 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2630632 | Parent:#131 Siblings:#132 Children:#163 #208 |
#160 | |
| From an "out of character" stand point I'm totally looking at this as a role-play scenario. I harbor zero hostility towards | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:19:29 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2630888 | Parent:#155 Siblings:(none) Children:#173 |
#161 | |
| Actually - inACTIVE chaff is just fine. Your statement of the ineffectiveness of non-posting townspersons is just silly ! This is a numbers game - we the townsfolk need to keep our numbers higher than the wolves, period. Now the odds of a non-poster being a werewolf or a serial killer is no lesser or greater than someone posting all the time. Just because they don't speak up HERE doesn't mean they are not using their abilities, be they a killvote, a kill, or even a good-guy special. Bottom line is that anyone not voting for two days in a row (or maybe its on the third day after non-voting - not 100% sure), will be removed from the game via GM Fiat. You can read NOTHING into a person posting or not posting. The CONTENT of their posting/ voting - that might have some relevancy. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:20:11 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2631144 | Parent:#157 Siblings:#166 Children:#170 |
#162 | |
| HA. You meant that to be a main post to be seen, but it got shuffled to page 2. Just laughing at the irony. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:22:16 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2631400 | Parent:#160 Siblings:#208 Children:#165 |
#163 | |
| Not always coming across that way, FYI. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:25:27 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Bodyguard and Martyr Link:165096#2631656 | Parent:#154 Siblings:(none) Children:#260 |
#164 | |
| You DON'T - unless you were the one doing the protecting ! The Bodyguard can protect each round. The Witch and Martyr can protect once and ONLY once. The Bodyguard has been ineffective so far (not his/ her fault really, the guessing game is random at this point). The Martyr has not protected yet as they have not been revealed upon death. The Witch has not protected as we have had a wolf victim each night. NEITHER of these special is likely to use their protect until we have a strong idea WHO is important enough to protect. The BEST CASE scenerio is that we ID the seer soon, before the BGuard or Witch dies ... | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:26:56 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2631912 | Parent:#163 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#165 | |
| If it isn't, I truly apologize. It was never my intent for anyone to feel attacked out of game. I'm just looking at this as a game. I promise I have a strategy and we'll see soon enough if it's a good one or not. It isn't about picking on anyone and I don't actually think anyone is really a beast of hell. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:27:24 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2632168 | Parent:#157 Siblings:#162 Children:#167 #172 |
#166 | |
| .... this SO makes me want to figure out a role for the WALRUS - just so everyone can argue I AM THE WALRUS !!!! | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:31:02 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2632424 | Parent:#166 Siblings:#172 Children:#169 |
#167 | |
| Crap! Werewalrus! Get the torches! | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:31:21 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Seer Link:165096#2632680 | Parent:#156 Siblings:#159 #216 Children:(none) |
#168 | |
| Ben got there first, but yes, the seer can't find the killer. The killer is BEST served by letting the Seer Id the wolves and let us kill them off and then picking us off as we start the next round of trying to figure out the "enemy", ESPECIALLY as there is NO ONE who can ID the killer. It's a pure process of elimination thing .... in more ways than one ;) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:33:06 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2632936 | Parent:#167 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#169 | |
| DEATH BY BUKKIT !!! | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:37:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2633192 | Parent:#162 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#170 | |
| You suck and I hate you. *hugs* :) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:38:02 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2633448 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#174 |
#171 | |
| OK - I have a feeling that the wolves MAY be trying to take advantage of the "Bandwagon" trend I've been seeing in the first couple rounds with FLOODs of votes htting an individual in rapid succession. I could be VERY wrong, but ... I'm going to cast my VOTE My hope is that we might hit a tie between you two and get to boil this down further, maybe even seeing some creamy rich voting trends come to the top. In that vein, I may move my vote around tomorrow per the trends that develop between now and then. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:38:29 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2633704 | Parent:#166 Siblings:#167 Children:(none) |
#172 | |
| ...koo koo kachoo? o_o *hides from the werewalrus!!* | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:43:21 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2633960 | Parent:#161 Siblings:(none) Children:#272 |
#173 | |
| That's correct, but because they don't post/vote, there's no information to go off of. That IS detrimental. However, a total lack of activity will result in their death. in this particular instance, I don't think we need to kill | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 03:49:38 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2634216 | Parent:#171 Siblings:(none) Children:#176 #177 |
#174 | |
| please note: | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:09:41 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2634472 | Parent:#143 Siblings:#144 #149 Children:(none) |
#175 | |
| vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:10:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2634728 | Parent:#174 Siblings:#177 Children:#178 |
#176 | |
| Well, if you agree that it's a bad idea for me to be lynched, it would be a good idea for you to change your vote to | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:11:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2634984 | Parent:#174 Siblings:#176 Children:#180 |
#177 | |
| You're assuming it's a wolf that's going to speak up saying they're the hunter. Maybe it's the killer, or another villager, or THE REAL HUNTER. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:13:04 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2635240 | Parent:#176 Siblings:(none) Children:#179 |
#178 | |
| at the moment, I'm not sure lynching | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:20:12 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2635496 | Parent:#178 Siblings:(none) Children:#181 |
#179 | |
| That's what I'm thinking too. I've come to notice a voting pattern within the new players I'm not happy with as a player, too. Voting If people retract their votes, you could always change yours, as long as it's before 11am. Up to you. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:24:56 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2635752 | Parent:#177 Siblings:(none) Children:#186 |
#180 | |
| yes, that's in fact true. I realized that shortly after I posted it, but figured that the slight logic flaw wasn't that important. The ONLY answer where claiming to be the hunter is valid is if you ARE the Hunter. If Ophiois not the hunter, then the real hunter should speak up, we lynch one of them, and then the other is slaughtered, one way or another. Either we get it right, and lynch the wolf, or we lynch the hunter who shoots the wolf. The serial killer has no business in this mess, nor should any villager. Anyone falsely claiming to be the Hunter, after it was already pointed out on day one that it was a bad idea, needs to try and have a better excuse next time :P | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:27:26 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2636008 | Parent:#179 Siblings:(none) Children:#182 #184 |
#181 | |
| You realize ties are bad, right? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:29:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2636264 | Parent:#181 Siblings:#184 Children:(none) |
#182 | |
| Getting lynched is a bad idea too. A tie breaker is better than just dying. :) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:37:46 GMT Author: Subject:On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2636520 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#187 |
#183 | |
| One of those most interesting facets of this game is that we win, or lose, as a team. There is only one person (the serial killer) who is on their own side. If the werewolves win, they all count it as a victory. if the village wins, even the dead win. Most people aspire to survive, but that isn't the ultimate goal. The goal is to let your faction win. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 04:48:40 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2636776 | Parent:#181 Siblings:#182 Children:#185 |
#184 | |
| Howso ? It just means we have a tie breaker. It's no worse than any other voting situation we create | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:00:45 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2637032 | Parent:#184 Siblings:(none) Children:#190 #194 |
#185 | |
| During a tie breaker, the Wolves will try to manipulate a tie again. in the case of a second tie, the Wolves get 2 kills. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:02:45 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2637288 | Parent:#180 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#186 | |
| ACTUALLY - Oph might have claimed to be the hunter and ACTUALLY be a vanilla townsperson. It would even be a valid move on her part, assuming she is looking to survive. She is making sure we don't lynch a townsperson and loose numerical advantage. Even if we lynch Syl, and he is ALSO a townsperson, unless he is a lover and the OTHER lover is a townsperson -we actually LOOSE NOTHING more than we would loose anyway. If she survives the "day", she SHOULD actually admit to not being the hunter though, since the wolves might be less likely to hit her than the REAL hunter - who would probably end up killing another townsperson in pointless retaliation. we would probably feel "betrayed" but ... Oph could be a wolf, I'm not saying she isn't, just that she could be a non-hunter AND a non-wolf. "If Ophiois not the hunter, then the real hunter should speak up, we lynch one of them, and then the other is slaughtered, one way or another. Either we get it right, and lynch the wolf, or we lynch the hunter who shoots the wolf." Ummmm ... NO. If Oph is lying, and the real hunter claimed their status, the townsfolk gain nothing. WE don't know who the hunter is, we would be guessing again. As I showed above, Oph is not necessarily the wolf, so a dual kill of the new claimant AND the actual hunter would leave us down by TWO villagers ! I just want everyone to be clearhaeded on this as there is NO certainty of what you suggest. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:10:00 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2637544 | Parent:#183 Siblings:(none) Children:#188 #203 |
#187 | |
| ..... realy ? I'm pretty sure the goal is to survive. First line of http:// "Ok the entire game is about surviving." That's why And how is the huntert a self-correcting special ? Unless we KNOW who the wolves are, they are LITERALLY shooting blind - as apt to kill a townsperson as a wolf, if not MORESO | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:12:10 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2637800 | Parent:#187 Siblings:#203 Children:#191 |
#188 | |
| What I'm saying is that if someone who is not the hunter claims to be the hunter, the Hunter knows this. When he kills someone, he shoots the liar. Hence, self-correcting. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:13:39 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2638056 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#193 #211 #217 #263 |
#189 | |
| You know, I really have to wonder at the credibility and reasoning for the group who's voting for me so consistently in that they don't seem to have either. I can't help but notice (now, anyway) that the people who have made noise about lynching me since day one are all of the new players Day one. It was the beginning of game and I was being silly because no one knows who anyone is. They saw me hassling their friend and group-voted against me, each mentioning the waffle incident with Day two. Day three. I bring up what I think are valid arguing points with two of the people voting against me, not yet realizing their connection. They dogpile on me, one with an abruptness that either shows him as a noisy wolf or an over-zealous new player who needs to reign it back. They don't think I'm a wolf, they're just getting revenge because they think I put their friend out of the game too early. This stinks of a clique and that's not cool. I'm ok with the idea of getting lynched. With how vocal I've been, I've been expecting it. But I don't like the idea of the game being played this way. It takes all the fun out of it. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:15:43 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2638312 | Parent:#185 Siblings:#194 Children:(none) |
#190 | |
| True enough, but I don't think their voting block is strong enough to make THAT big a difference right now, any moreso than the lovers ... AND if they DO try to manipulate the voting, we might be able to catch them. ... I actually have one more point to make, but I'm holding it in reserve as i don't want to tip my hand to the wolves :P | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:16:22 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2638568 | Parent:#188 Siblings:(none) Children:#192 |
#191 | |
| Again - the liar could be a townperson trying to stay alive ... | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:18:22 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2638824 | Parent:#191 Siblings:(none) Children:#224 |
#192 | |
| If they are, they're doing a really shitty job, and deserve what they get. Claiming falsely to be the Hunter gets you shot. Claiming to be the witch gets you poisoned. Claiming to be the Martyr, no detriment. Pick something better, next game, after your death has consumed one of the villages useful resources. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:18:33 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2639080 | Parent:#189 Siblings:#211 #217 #263 Children:#196 #197 |
#193 | |
| I voted for you because it added up, I only looked at who else voted after i voted. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:19:02 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2639336 | Parent:#185 Siblings:#190 Children:(none) |
#194 | |
| in the case of a tie breaker the wolves argue stronger and you get more insight into who people are. only bad if the tie is not broken. actually good if it puts pressure on people and we have more behavior to study. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:21:32 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2639592 | Parent:#139 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#195 | |
| VOTE | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:24:57 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2639848 | Parent:#193 Siblings:#197 Children:#199 |
#196 | |
| Don't worry, I don't think that of you. To be specific I'm talking about | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:27:15 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2640104 | Parent:#193 Siblings:#196 Children:(none) |
#197 | |
| You have your chance to change your vote now, since new information has come up. As the village, you DO NOT lynch the hunter, unless we have two claims to be the hunter. Since a second claim has yet to arise, why don't you change your vote, and can always change it back as new info comes out. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:27:51 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Status Link:165096#2640360 | Parent:#75 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#198 | |
| curses, foiled again! :P (that's a joke) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:30:59 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2640616 | Parent:#196 Siblings:(none) Children:#201 |
#199 | |
| Sadly, your time in the game is very limited. You're either going to get lynched, or eaten or stabbed in the night. Before that happens, why don't you post up your suspicions, so that we at least know what you were thinking before you died. Also, since the newbs seem to think you might be doing something silly, take a moment to recant as hunter, if you ARE just a villager. (Which ultimately won't help, cause then you'll simply be lynched for changing your story) but at least then we could look back and see what you thought once we can see what your role was. (that was a little more convoluted than I wanted :( ) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:32:49 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2640872 | Parent:#119 Siblings:(none) Children:#242 |
#200 | |
| I've been voting for you since day one. So what you're saying is that you've been voting for her at a time when it was actually impossible for you to have any evidence whatsoever of her being a wolf? Sounds like you don't have any good reason to vote for her, then. Not saying you're a wolf necessarily, just pointing out that you clearly have some kind of unfounded vendetta. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:34:40 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2641128 | Parent:#199 Siblings:(none) Children:#202 |
#201 | |
| I'm afraid their decision to vote for me has nothing to do with me claiming to be the Hunter, so recanting would be pointless if you think it will effect their decision. I might post my suspicions later. I'll see how this place looks tomorrow morning and decide then. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:40:33 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2641384 | Parent:#201 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#202 | |
| The difference recanting would make is tht the real hunter (assuming you aren't) wouldn't have to spek up that way, to prove you're a fraud. Assuming you ARE the Hunter, you get to go out in a blaze of glory regardless. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:41:28 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2641640 | Parent:#187 Siblings:#188 Children:#215 |
#203 | |
| I agree with - villagers - wolves - serial killer (or werehampster or whatever) - the lovers, IF one is a baddie and the other is not It doesn't matter if you live or die, just if your group wins. To address what you've said elsewhere, a vanilla villager claiming to be the hunter is VERY unhelpful. The real hunter would probably reveal themselves (and therefore be eaten before they are most useful) and, assuming that the liar was a wolf, we'd waste a lynching on them. This puts us down two villagers, probably three as the hunter would be eaten and their kill would be essentially random this early in the game. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:43:34 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2641896 | Parent:#124 Siblings:#125 #126 #213 Children:(none) |
#204 | |
| im good with lynching | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:45:14 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2642152 | Parent:#61 Siblings:#67 Children:#235 |
#205 | |
| To address your point, I freely admit that I made a mistake. However, having seen | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:53:58 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2642408 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#209 #225 #229 |
#206 | |
| Now, I'm hardly an expert at this game, and I'll be the first to admit I have plenty of bad judgment calls in my history here. But for those still voting for Ophio, this is my reasoning for why that's a bad idea. Claiming to be the Hunter when you're not is suicide. Why? Because the hunter is one of the specials that can kill you without a lynch vote. As soon as you (falsely) claim to be the Hunter, the real Hunter knows you're a wolf. So when the real Hunter dies, he's going to take the liar with him. As a lying wolf, that's the BEST scenario, because it means you survive a few rounds before death. The other possibility is this. Some claims to be the Hunter and then a second person claims to be the real Hunter. We lynch the first person, and if they're a wolf, they're dead. If they're actually the real Hunter, they kill the second person who claimed to be the Hunter. Either way, a wolf is dead. The point being, lying about being the Hunter is a death sentence. (This goes double for the Witch, because they doesn't need to reveal themselves, just poison you in the night.) For this reason, most baddies wouldn't do it. At the very least they'd claim some other role. But even IF they were tricky enough to do so, it's a self-correcting situation that requires no action from anyone except the real Hunter. Lynching someone claiming to be Hunter or Witch is a waste, plain and simple. If anyone disagrees, I'm open to hearing your arguments, but I think it's a pretty self-contained situation. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:55:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2642664 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#207 | |
| Also, I'm going to vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 05:56:33 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2642920 | Parent:#160 Siblings:#163 Children:#230 |
#208 | |
| I've noticed that you're being careful to put in-character conversation inside of quotes and out-of-character conversation as unadorned text. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:00:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2643176 | Parent:#206 Siblings:#225 #229 Children:#210 |
#209 | |
| When does the cereal killer decide his kill? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:04:28 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2643432 | Parent:#209 Siblings:(none) Children:#212 |
#210 | |
| I think it's the same time as the wolves? My understanding is that, aside from lynching, all nighttime actions take place simultaneously. So, theoretically, the serial killer could kill someone, the wolves could kill someone, the witch could kill someone, and the hunter (if someone else killed him) could kill someone. Hell, if one of the dead is a lover, you could theoretically have 5 deaths in one night. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:05:17 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2643688 | Parent:#189 Siblings:#193 #217 #263 Children:(none) |
#211 | |
| For what it's worth, I, too am a friend of a) The waffle thing was funny b) I didn't have better evidence towards anyone else c) You weren't at the top of the lynch mob anyway | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:06:05 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2643944 | Parent:#210 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#212 | |
| Plus suicides from the non votes. I think there will be one or two tonight. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:08:43 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2644200 | Parent:#124 Siblings:#125 #126 #204 Children:(none) |
#213 | |
| If This is the logic that I'm going with for today. Also with the claim (and no dispute) of UNVOTE VOTE | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:16:34 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Bodyguard and Martyr Link:165096#2644456 | Parent:#147 Siblings:#152 #154 #261 Children:(none) |
#214 | |
| Good point, although the bodyguard has the option of not saving the first turn, and the witch could still save the victim (assuming it is the Seer). The advantage in doing so would only be to try and trick the wolves. Of course I might only be saying this in order to encourage the wolves to actually attack the seer (and not assume they are protected and eat another). | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:26:12 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2644712 | Parent:#203 Siblings:(none) Children:#218 #219 #223 |
#215 | |
| Look - let's be 100% CRYSTAL clear here folks - I am simply pointing out the what some folks here are posting as GIVENS and FACTs simply aren't. Upon some deep reflection, here are my THOUGHTS (not facts, just theories). If someone claims to be the hunter, the chances are probably pretty good that they either ARE the hunter or they are a wolf. I don't think most vanilla villagers are going to "game" the system so far as to say they are a hunter simply to survive. ALSO folks tend to be driven by social attitudes, and I doubt a non-hunter is willing to suffer the scorn of the "community" once their ruse is discovered. SO - someone claims to be the hunter. The next assumption you posit is that if the person claiming to be the hunter is NOT, the real hunter will step forth and dispute the claim. I'm not sure if the hunter should DO that. OK, yes, the chances are good that the false hunter is a wolf, and the hinter can then play a zero-sum game. See - if the false claimant IS a wolf, the hunter is then DEAD, and can only HOPE to take out ONE PROBABLE wolf, the False claimant. If the false claimant IS a wolf, and the true hunter is mistakenly lynched, then they take out the false claimant - Zero sum: one wolf and one villager down (lets just put aside the fact that the false claimant COULD be a non-wolf). If the town lynches the false-claimant wolf, I'm assuming we will KNOW from their deathnote they were a wolf. So then the hunter gets protected by the same BGard - Witch - BGard - Martyr set up we suggested before. BUT that would WASTE the protection we want to give the Seer ! OR we let the hunter get eaten, and loose the effectiveness of their revenge (since the hunter SHOULD NOT revenge on a guess !). So again, unless we want to waste our Seer protection program, at most we give the Hunter one night of protection with the BGard, then ... crunch. The alternative ? The hunter stays hidden and bides. SO - tell me, is it better to take out a probable wolf at the cost of a villagers life ? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:31:05 GMT Author: Subject::P Link:165096#2644968 | Parent:#156 Siblings:#159 #168 Children:(none) |
#216 | |
| Don't worry, we can lynch you anytime Killer, if the wolves don't eat you first (hint, hint). | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:31:35 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2645224 | Parent:#189 Siblings:#193 #211 #263 Children:(none) |
#217 | |
| Wow, it really sounds like you are taking all of this very personally. I have to say, connection or not, I kind of resent the implication that we are just jumping on you because of our friend. It has nothing to do with cliques. In the real world, I've no idea who I agree this has turned quickly from being fun. I have my reasons for why I've voted why I did. Once this is over, I may reveal it. Honestly, this isn't personal, but I can't help feeling that this post is a tactic to shake the vote off your back, which to me seems like it is not how the game should be played, but I guess all is fair in love and war. I don't know you from Eve. There is no conspiracy. None of us friends of Yeah, totally not fun now. :( | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:31:40 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2645480 | Parent:#215 Siblings:#219 #223 Children:#220 |
#218 | |
| See my post here for more detailed thoughts on the matter: http:// Really, it's the Hunter's call. Yes, coming out early sacrifices the life of the Hunter. However, the Bodyguard can protect them for a night, and if the Hunter thinks they have a good suspect for a wolf, it may be worth it. The problem with staying hidden is that people trust a special and give more weight to what they say. For example, if I were to come out as the Cupid (which obviously I'm not), and no one challenges me, I must not be a wolf. Therefore, while my guesses and reasoning may be incorrect, you at least would know I'm sincere in my desire to kill the wolves - as opposed to everyone else, because you can't trust a single one of them. So having a wolf hiding as a hunter, even just for a day or two, can cause problems. They'll have far more influence over our votes than we'd like a wolf to have. But really, like I said, it's the Hunter's call. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:33:53 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2645736 | Parent:#215 Siblings:#218 #223 Children:(none) |
#219 | |
| BTW - that's an honest request for opinions, not rhetorical | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:37:20 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2645992 | Parent:#218 Siblings:(none) Children:#222 |
#220 | |
| Yeah - I can see that, but my issue is that it's based on SOCIAL FEELINGS - not logic or data. I may be over analyzing - but that's all Ive got to work with - I don't know the trends like some of the vet players, and I'm not sure I'd trust them even if I did. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:38:49 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2646248 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#226 #236 |
#221 | |
| Yo Joe: Would it be possible to get an offical headcount of non-posters? Is anyone going to jump off a bridge any time soon? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:39:02 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2646504 | Parent:#220 Siblings:(none) Children:#228 |
#222 | |
| Wait, what is based on social feelings now? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:39:07 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2646760 | Parent:#215 Siblings:#218 #219 Children:(none) |
#223 | |
| Also, based on purely a numbers game... yes, a villager is worth the trade for a wolf. There are 4 of them, and more of us. With each kill we get (now we're at 3) the thought process behind the choice of the kill becomes a little clearer, since it belongs to less people. Adittionally, the wolves tend to get a backed into a corner feeling, with fewer wolves, and the seer becomes all the more important then, because their responsability is to find a smaller number of people. For instance, if our seer currently had one wolf, I would say that it might be worth revealing them. I don't think it'll be necessary, but it might be a good idea, considering how much cover we can give an "outed" seer. But having confirmed villagers (note, the serial killer blends in among them) allows us to trash the werewolf threat, and then turn to face the killer. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:39:46 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2647016 | Parent:#192 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#224 | |
| I can see what you are saying - but this is all based on convention, not logic. Not saying that it's not the best way to go, after all, the prisoner's dilemma IS beatable if folks stick to their pre-decided plan, but most often it falls apart ... | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:44:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2647272 | Parent:#206 Siblings:#209 #229 Children:#227 |
#225 | |
| Yes, but what if the person claiming to be the Hunter isn't a wolf? Also, I do follow your logic, but I don't think that everyone may come to that same conclusion. I'll admit, this is the first time I've played this game in a non-live setting. Maybe I'm making mistakes. Hell, I didn't even know we could reveal what we are. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:47:16 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2647528 | Parent:#221 Siblings:#236 Children:(none) |
#226 | |
| http://cuddlepuddle.org/~adam/lj_games/ look through each day. you can count who voted. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:49:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2647784 | Parent:#225 Siblings:(none) Children:#232 |
#227 | |
| Yes, but what if the person claiming to be the Hunter isn't a wolf? Then they are sabotaging the entire village. The thing to remember is you do not win by staying alive, you win if your side wins. If a villager claims a role they don't actually possess, it only leads to confusion and unnecessary deaths. This is a team game, and we have to think accordingly. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:50:16 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2648040 | Parent:#222 Siblings:(none) Children:#233 |
#228 | |
| "people trust a special and give more weight to what they say" - my whole point is that its entirely possible, though I'm not certain how PROBABLE, that a wolf might claim to be a special and go unchallenged, so that trust, as you have stated previously, can be very damaging. OK - here's a thought. ALL of the GOOD Specials COULD come out and claim their status right now. If true villagers don't lie (and why would they at this point), then only the 3 wolves and the serial killer would have any motivation to counter said claims. 4 functional specials on both the evil and good sides. We could then begin playing an elimination game ... as there would be 16 non-declareds vs the 8 declareds .... I'll have to crunch some numbers ... | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:56:32 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2648296 | Parent:#206 Siblings:#209 #225 Children:#231 #237 |
#229 | |
| There is one BIG hole in the argument here - the assumption that anyone claiming to be a Hunter FALSELY is a wolf. I know you have defending this assumption by showing a strong tradition for non-wolves NOT to claim to be the hunter both out of fear of reprisal from the real hunter (not necessarily the wisest action on the hunter's part), and by the logic that if one's TEAM wins then YOU win (not necessarily the mindset of all the players here). SO - I think that you MAY be correct, but not necessarily so. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:58:19 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2648552 | Parent:#208 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#230 | |
| Yep, that is true. There is some descriptive text early that was not in quotes, but as the game appears to be a lot less role-play than I originally envisioned, I've dropped the flavor text. If I play again, I will keep the rp out of it altogether. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 06:59:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2648808 | Parent:#229 Siblings:#237 Children:(none) |
#231 | |
| This. I agree, 100%. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:01:26 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2649064 | Parent:#227 Siblings:(none) Children:#234 |
#232 | |
| See below. I think in any given game there could be players who are playing to survive before playing to have a team win. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:02:55 GMT Author: Subject:Re: On the nature of this game: Link:165096#2649320 | Parent:#228 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#233 | |
| it seems like that is suggested every game and we always decide against it... i could be wrong though, it's been a few years. Really, the Seer comes out when they've found enough wolves (unless they're in danger of lynching). One game I was the Seer and I came out on Day 3, because I'd already found 2 of the 3 wolves. I think that's the earliest a seer ever voluntarily came out though, and that was just luck. It was a very boring game. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:06:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2649576 | Parent:#232 Siblings:(none) Children:#241 |
#234 | |
| My hope, then, is that such a person would read these threads, realize how much such an attempt would damage the villagers, and give it up. It's not impossible for someone to deliberately sabotage their own team, but I think it's unlikely. Regardless, it's a moot point. Do you really think the best course of action is to lynch someone claiming to be a special on the chance that they're a villager lying to save themselves? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:07:01 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2649832 | Parent:#205 Siblings:(none) Children:#238 |
#235 | |
| Right, but others disagreed with that notion. Does that make everyone who voted for the sheriff a suspected wolf? I think the biggest issue here is many folks are approaching this as if there is only one correct answer or action. I say there are many ways we could achieve our goals and maybe some are sounder than others, but that fact that people are coming across with ideas as if they are solid, hard facts when they aren't, if a bit daunting, if not frustrating. It's a game and we all hope our team wins, but it's hard to agree on how to achieve that when you don't know who your team is. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:07:02 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2650088 | Parent:#221 Siblings:#226 Children:(none) |
#236 | |
| Time:2009-09-24 07:10:09 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2650344 | Parent:#229 Siblings:#231 Children:#239 |
#237 | |
| As I said to If someone is lying about being a special, even if the real special chose to stay hidden, it would only be a matter of time before they were revealed as a liar. As soon as the real special revealed themselves or was killed, we'd know the truth and lynch the liar. So... what are you recommending we do? We either lynch Ophio, or we don't. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:13:18 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2650600 | Parent:#235 Siblings:(none) Children:#244 |
#238 | |
But to answer your question - everyone but me is a suspected wolf/serial killer. I think that's a healthy mindset for every villager. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:15:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2650856 | Parent:#237 Siblings:(none) Children:#240 |
#239 | |
| I can't speak for I'm certainly not suggesting that we lynch those who declare themselves to be of a certain status (and i don't think he is either) :) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:17:52 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2651112 | Parent:#239 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#240 | |
| Fair enough, I just think we're splitting hairs. You are correct that we shouldn't treat an uncontested claim as unassailable, but at the same time, we shouldn't waste our efforts debating whether or not to lynch them either - until other evidence puts their claim in doubt, that is. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:18:16 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2651368 | Parent:#234 Siblings:(none) Children:#245 |
#241 | |
| OK, step back a sec - your arguments are very good - up till the point you start making a straw man argument - he's NOT suggesting "the best course of action is to lynch someone claiming to be a special on the chance that they're a villager lying to save themselves" - isn't even implying it. Don't go off that edge man - I need you to keep my own ideas on track :) | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:18:18 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2651624 | Parent:#200 Siblings:(none) Children:#243 |
#242 | |
| I don't think anyone had a good reason to vote for anyone early on. The vote for I think my biggest mistake was approaching this from any stand point of role-playing. It was all fun and games when it was waffles and toppings, but the minute I brought out accusations of beasts of hell, I as a player had my credibility questioned and was accused of coming off as attacking people and forming up some clique. I was playing the role of someone trapped in a village filled with hidden werewolves. Clearly, that isn't what the game is about. It's more of a logic/sociological puzzle. Hell, for all I know the accusations are just part of the game, too. **shrug** You live and learn. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:22:31 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2651880 | Parent:#242 Siblings:(none) Children:#246 |
#243 | |
| I don't think the roleplaying was a problem, really - or at least, not one that couldn't be easily cleared up. I caught on to the roleplaying without any difficulty myself. And yes, I'd say accusations tend to be part of the game in general. I think the bigger issue, for me at least, is that you have voted for Ophio for the last 3 days straight. Even now, when there is at least the possibility that she is the Hunter, you haven't changed your mind. I'm curious as to what exactly you consider to be "creating chaos and division". | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:24:19 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2652136 | Parent:#238 Siblings:(none) Children:#247 |
#244 | |
| Yep, I guess that is a pretty smart way to go. I mean, unless of course you know different. At this point I think either way this goes down, my plan will fail. Again, you live and learn. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:24:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2652392 | Parent:#241 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#245 | |
| It's not meant to be a straw man, it's a sincere question. He is still voting for Ophio and seems to be creating scenarios in which she could be lying. As I said, I view it to be a moot point, and I'm not sure why we're still discussing it. Maybe you guys are talking about it much more theoretically than I am, but I just think our efforts are more valuable elsewhere at the moment. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:34:42 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2652648 | Parent:#243 Siblings:(none) Children:#249 |
#246 | |
| Accusing people over wierdness such as sardines, calling me out for being quiet, then for being loud. Suggesting someone who sided with me makes us the Lovers. Me changing my vote now will only let her escape if she's a wolf. Besides, she's no longer a threat, I'm the one who's going to be lynched and the only way I can think to save myself at this point would not benefit my team. Well, it's not likely to, at any rate. I think there is a greater chance of her being a wolf than her being a hunter. I also believe there is a greater chance of me being a special than of me being wolf. There are risks either way. I just hope if I am lynched, she really is the hunter. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:34:48 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2652904 | Parent:#244 Siblings:(none) Children:#248 #257 |
#247 | |
| My first game, in the very last round, it was me and three other people. One was a wolf, and I was the sheriff, and therefore the deciding vote. I picked the wrong person, and we lost. The worst part is, the guy I lynched had figured out who the wolf was and explained it perfectly, but I didn't believe him. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:35:56 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2653160 | Parent:#247 Siblings:#257 Children:#250 |
#248 | |
| I guess we'll see how things go tomorrow. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:36:04 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2653416 | Parent:#246 Siblings:(none) Children:#251 |
#249 | |
| I think the sardines thing was a joke. There are a lot of jokes like that, the first day or two especially. If you're a special, you should probably reveal yourself before we lynch you. Otherwise, looks like you're done for. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:38:17 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2653672 | Parent:#248 Siblings:(none) Children:#253 |
#250 | |
| You probably can't do any worse than single-handedly throw the game to the wolves :P | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:39:07 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2653928 | Parent:#249 Siblings:(none) Children:#252 |
#251 | |
| Sure, but if I do reveal myself, then the wolves will just get me, right? I can't count on people believing me at this point and protecting me. Either I'm killed by my own people or the wolves get me. So it's a no win situation. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:40:46 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2654184 | Parent:#251 Siblings:(none) Children:#254 |
#252 | |
| Well, if you're a special, the wolves may not eat you. First of all, if they don't eat you, we may assume you're lying and lynch you the next day. Secondly, if they do eat you, the bodyguard might be protecting you. Lastly, even if they do manage to kill you, at least we won't have wasted a lynch on a villager. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:40:59 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2654440 | Parent:#250 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#253 | |
| True. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:42:16 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2654696 | Parent:#252 Siblings:(none) Children:#255 |
#254 | |
| I think I'll sleep on it. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:43:09 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2654952 | Parent:#254 Siblings:(none) Children:#256 |
#255 | |
| Be careful, people need time to change their votes. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 07:52:01 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2655208 | Parent:#255 Siblings:(none) Children:#266 |
#256 | |
| I'm not convinced it will change anything. 1. The hunter may be seen as more important. 2. It could just be seen as me trying 3. People may already think I'm a big meanie or that I'm part of a clique that's ganged up on her. 4. I'm not convinced that reavealing who I am won't cause more havoc for the villagers. Like I said, I'll sleep on it and hope for the best. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 09:54:22 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2655464 | Parent:#247 Siblings:#248 Children:#268 |
#257 | |
| Would you happen to have a link to that game? I love post-game voyeurism. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 09:58:52 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2655720 | Parent:#79 Siblings:#87 Children:(none) |
#258 | |
| If someone wolf-whistles, do we immediately break off the competition and go after them? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 09:59:49 GMT Author: Subject:Man, a lot of stuff happens while I'm sleeping Link:165096#2655976 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#259 | |
| ... so I'm playing catch-up this morning (I'm in London, 8 hours ahead of California). First, I forgot all about player suicide. So unvote Second, Third, vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 10:06:47 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Bodyguard and Martyr Link:165096#2656232 | Parent:#164 Siblings:(none) Children:#262 |
#260 | |
| If the SEER outs himself, and the BODYGUARD protects him, is he protected from both the WOLVES and the SERIAL KILLER? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 10:10:58 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Bodyguard and Martyr Link:165096#2656488 | Parent:#147 Siblings:#152 #154 #214 Children:(none) |
#261 | |
| That plan will only work if the SERIAL KILLER doesn't try to kill the SEER. See the clarifications. The BODYGUARD and MARTYR save against both WOLVES and the SERIAL KILLER, but the WITCH saves only against the WOLVES. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 10:12:34 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Bodyguard and Martyr Link:165096#2656744 | Parent:#260 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#262 | |
| Nevermind. The clarifications before day 1 settled that. The BODYGUARD and MARTYR protect against both WOLF and SERIAL KILLER, including at the same time. But the WITCH protects against the WOLVES only! | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 10:22:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2657000 | Parent:#189 Siblings:#193 #211 #217 Children:(none) |
#263 | |
| I have to say, I disagree with your logic. 1) There are new players in the game, a number of which were brought in by 2) There was a (very amusing) RP exchange on the first day in which accusations of wolfiness were raised against you and 3) 4) new players by definition are unsure how to vote at the start and looking for obvious answers It seems obvious to me, to be honest, that you will be a major target for new players. That's not a conspiracy, that's playing the game. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 10:24:48 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Regarding Faymar Link:165096#2657256 | Parent:#123 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#264 | |
| *shiver* How do you feel about Lucky Charms? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 10:25:59 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Regarding Faymar Link:165096#2657512 | Parent:#98 Siblings:#107 Children:(none) |
#265 | |
| But but but it wasn't meeeeee! | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 10:27:49 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2657768 | Parent:#256 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#266 | |
| I have a really bad feeling about this... | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 10:55:54 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2658024 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#269 |
#267 | |
| A few people have called me out as a noisy wolf. I put forth these players could easily be the other wolves rallying to defend their pack mate, I will also state, that if I die it is very likely to be poor for us villagers. I only hope that if I die (which seems likely looking out at this angry mob) that Am I 100% certain she's a wolf and not the Hunter? No, but I am pretty darn sure. She goaded me into flaring up my participation and my accusations. Perhaps it was a foolish, newbie mistake to respond, but isn't that just what a wolf would be hoping for? I think that perhaps she laid a very good trap and I blundered right into it. Good on her, but that would be good for wolves, wouldn't it? I hope that some of you will see that it is unlikely that I am a werewolf. I hope that you will understand my reasons for not revealing what else I am right now. I honestly think the risk to the village is greater if I do. I hope some of you will change your vote. If not to Good luck to you all. Well, the villagers at least. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 13:42:15 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2658280 | Parent:#257 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#268 | |
| Not off the top of my head, no. But I remember the last time I looked back on it, it was just terrible to see how badly I'd done. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 13:54:40 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2658536 | Parent:#267 Siblings:(none) Children:#270 #275 |
#269 | |
| I will also state, that if I die it is very likely to be poor for us villagers. Yea... if this is true, then tell us why. If you're not willing to tell us why - for example, by revealing that you're a special - than I'm not really buying it. And, you know, to say you only make one post a day when you made 2 and then 3 is not much of an exaggeration. I hardly think that makes her a liar. I hope that you will understand my reasons for not revealing what else I am right now. I honestly think the risk to the village is greater if I do. Again, not really buying it. If you don't reveal, you die today. If you do reveal, you might live. So, you know, I don't really see how the risk is greater. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 15:27:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2659816 | Parent:#269 Siblings:#275 Children:#274 |
#270 | |
| Yeah, I agree with H&H. Having to "sleep on it" and the village being at greater risk if you do is NOT a smart ploy. If | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 15:38:15 GMT Author: Subject:Re: IMPORTANT: Seer Link:165096#2660328 | Parent:#159 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#271 | |
| I was unaware. That does change things. Thanks | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 15:41:19 GMT Author: Subject:Re: okay, just cause i've been the victim before... Link:165096#2660840 | Parent:#173 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#272 | |
| I just don't want us to lose 2 villagers, because we lynch someone active and someone inactive suicides. It tends to speed up the game. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 15:47:52 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2661096 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#273 | |
| My reasons for voting for 1) I don't have any evidence of anyone else being a wolf. 2) She's loud and rude (in my opinion). 3) It's a game. I'll vote how I choose. If you don't like the way I vote or play, lynch/eat/cap'ncrunch/shoot/poison me. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 16:08:45 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2662888 | Parent:#270 Siblings:(none) Children:#276 |
#274 | |
| Then so be it. I still don't believe that Also, I posted that before sleeping and the hours between the post where I said I would sleep on it and when I did post, there was no activitity that I saw. There still isn't much, so it was likely too late at that point I said I would sleep on it. My fate is pretty sealed and I'm okay with it. I'll be pleased as punch if I'm wrong, she is the Hunter and the villagers win. That's a victory for me, even if I'm dead. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 16:22:23 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2665192 | Parent:#269 Siblings:#270 Children:#277 |
#275 | |
| Yes, I might live, but I doubt it. I'm pretty sure I'll be killed by the wolves if you lot don't and I'm not convinced that even knowing the vote will change. And I don't really need you to buy it, just enough others, right? Then again, you pretty much lead the crusade against Maybe | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 16:27:45 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2665704 | Parent:#274 Siblings:(none) Children:#278 |
#276 | |
| Wow, you totally missed the point of what I was saying. Nevermind then, the point is moot. And as far as "cliques" go, I have said nothing about them. Re-read my post, it was all a discussion of tactics, and my belief that your delaying was a tactical failing. If you're something important like the Seer or witch, and you elected not to reveal last night (this morning would be too late), then you've screwed the village. And as far as | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 16:32:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2666216 | Parent:#275 Siblings:(none) Children:#279 |
#277 | |
| For the record, it was, in fact, my Sheriff plan, | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 16:40:16 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2666728 | Parent:#276 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#278 | |
| I never said I was the Seer or the Witch. I get what people are saying about the unchallanged bit, but I'm not sure I buy the logic that if she wasn't the Hunter, the real Hunter would bust her publicly. My point, was at the point in the night were even began considering if revealing my status was a good idea or not, it was probably too late, so if my status screws the village it was more about me being green than anything else. I get that you were calling my delaying tactic poor. I wasn't really using it as a delaying tactic. I was just being honest. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 16:41:33 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2666984 | Parent:#277 Siblings:(none) Children:#280 |
#279 | |
| Fair enough, but he did die for supporting it. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 16:47:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2668264 | Parent:#279 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#280 | |
| True. I felt bad about that. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 16:56:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2669288 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#283 #284 #308 |
#281 | |
| Aw, hell. Okay, I'm now stuck in a situation here where things are going to get very bad, very quickly. It may be too late to salvage it, but I'm gonna give it a shot and hope enough people can change their votes in time to make a difference, at least for ONE night, as that's all that we're going to get. First, let me address a thing. Cthulhu is a good friend of mine, but I began my voting for Ophio early on on a lark, a silly RP-based bit of fun, and have since continued because she's being loud and aggressive. This is exactly the sort of behavior I would expect in someone who is - by their own admission - blunt and aggressive, who is being caught in a lie and trying to redirect aggression elsewhere. That's the entirety of my reasoning; that and not having anything better to go on. I'll note that the threads which have been seized on so far haven't borne fruit. So now I'll come to the real crux of this, the thing there's no reason for me to do if I'm not on the chopping block... which I am. Change your votes. I'll change mine; the logic behind the reveal of the Hunter is too sound for me. But don't throw away innocents; at least make the wolves kill us first, or you're doing their job for them. unvote And because I'm forced into it, because I literally have no better option, I'll vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 16:58:20 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2669544 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#289 |
#282 | |
| Sorry for the reveal if you didn't think it good, Syl. But better the wolves take us than our the villagers. At least this way there won't be three, four, or even five dead in the morning. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:10:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2670568 | Parent:#281 Siblings:#284 #308 Children:#285 |
#283 | |
| Oho! Stick that in your pipe and smoke it. So now, assuming everyone is telling the truth, if Ophio gets lynched she's going to shoot Good times. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:10:17 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2670824 | Parent:#281 Siblings:#283 #308 Children:#286 |
#284 | |
| Shit, are you kidding? UNVOTE VOTE Why | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:21:15 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2671848 | Parent:#283 Siblings:(none) Children:#293 |
#285 | |
| Wow. Just.... wow. Your doomsaying is totally uncalled for, and detrimental to the entire village, since you are basically trying to create an immediacy that simply isn't present. If we lose the Lovers, we're no worse off that we were before, unless one of them is a special. It SOUNDS like that's not the case, and honestly, I'm MORE inclined to vote for them, because they are a liability later in the game. The fact that they MAY have a hidden agenda is detrimental to the village, even if they ultimately do not. We have no way of knowing within a reasonable period of time whether or not they are worth letting live, and unfortunately, it would be a waste of our seer's time to check. The two kills is likely to great a temptation for one of the groups with a kill, and there's not much we can do about it. The biggest thing that it is important to remember about the Lovers is that it is a role that is not given by the Mayor, but one that Cupid decided upon. It is not mutually exclusive with other roles. Werewolves can be lovers. Cupid may have done us a favor, or may have killed two innocent villagers. Whichever case, I think it is proverbially "too late now", whether you tell us we're hosed or not... | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:22:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2672104 | Parent:#284 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#286 | |
| Finally someone listens to me :P | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:22:50 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2672360 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #288 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#287 | |
| Well, I think we're in for an interesting night. Probably won't help at this point, but following | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:28:16 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2672616 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #290 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:(none) |
#288 | |
| By my reasoning, flawed as it may be, I'm torn between unvote vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:28:38 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2672872 | Parent:#282 Siblings:(none) Children:#311 |
#289 | |
| No, I'm fine with it. I just think it was even too late last night. My biggest worry was that it was pointless as it wouldn't been see as enough of reason to spare us. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:29:17 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2673128 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #291 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#294 |
#290 | |
| Hmmm - well, as stated previously, the reveal might be too little too late. I'm not sur ethat the reveal is anything but a smokescreen, but it's unlikely a last minute all or nothing hail Mary play. Starry will of course be toast next round regardless of whether Starry is a lover or not, as it looks like So - it might not matter but unvote vote | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:35:23 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2673384 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #292 #295 #304 #321 Children:#312 |
#291 | |
| It would be nice to neither lynch the Hunter, nor the Lovers. The killers will take care of those for us. Please, change your votes. You've got less than a half hour now... | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:35:53 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2673896 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #295 #304 #321 Children:#296 #297 #313 |
#292 | |
| In case I get eaten by wolves or done in by the serial killer, I'm going to out a theory that I stumbled upon last night. Know that I made sure I wasn't breaking any rules before writing this. I looked at It is not that big a leap to say that one of the people in the game who are on his friends list is a wolf. The list: (If there's anyone missing from this list, please say whom.) Assuming the person heeded his request and said nothing, the only person who didn't make some comment was So, it may be one of the others. I'm wondering if it's I only have suspicions at this point, but it has to be one of the people on that list. Have fun picking this apart. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:37:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2674152 | Parent:#285 Siblings:(none) Children:#298 |
#293 | |
| So you're trying to say it's a good thing if we lose 5 villagers? That makes no sense. Wouldn't the best bet be leaving the three of them alone until we figure more stuff out? Your "Let's kill them all and see how the chips fall" idea is pretty extremist, and smells kind of wolf/killery to me. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:39:33 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2674664 | Parent:#290 Siblings:(none) Children:#302 |
#294 | |
| Absetentions aren't going to help. I've NO idea if Gwydion is a wolf, but | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:40:39 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2675176 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #14 #15 #19 #21 #37 #38 #52 #57 #74 #78 #91 #98 #102 #122 #124 #136 #140 #146 #148 #157 #171 #183 #189 #206 #207 #221 #259 #267 #273 #281 #282 #287 #288 #290 #291 #292 #304 #321 Children:#300 |
#295 | |
| I vote On another note I will be out of town starting tonight with little to no access to the internet tomorrow (Friday). Please take my silence as inconvenient timing; I will try to post when I can from my iPhone. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:41:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2675432 | Parent:#292 Siblings:#297 #313 Children:#305 #309 |
#296 | |
| So it's okay to read other people's LJs and post what they say there? If I was to find a way to hack into the nighttime votes it would be cool for me to post that? Also, if you knew me at all you'd know I don't mourn the death of anyone, let alone someone in a game. Your fearmongering and defensive accusations still point towards someone who needs a lynching. My vote for you stands. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:43:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2675688 | Parent:#292 Siblings:#296 #313 Children:#299 #301 |
#297 | |
| ugh ... this kinda borders on cheating ... we arent supoosed to use outside resources in the game, right ? | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:43:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2675944 | Parent:#293 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#298 | |
| That's not what I'm saying. i'm saying that we'll find out soon, since the current likelihood is they could all be dead by morning. We're actually saying the same thing, except only one of us is still voting for them... | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:45:19 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2676200 | Parent:#297 Siblings:#301 Children:#303 #307 |
#299 | |
| I checked with Joe before I wrote this. | |||
| Time:2009-09-24 17:47:04 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:165096#2676456 | Parent:#295 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#300< |